Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 4883282" data-attributes="member: 2067">I think the &quot;ritual mastery&quot; angle of the dragonmarks makes up for this. As a House Jorasco commoner, I can still learn and use the Remove Affliction ritual. For a random NPC from the street, this is pretty cool and pretty useful, in a setting context. This also makes the feat useful if I'm not already a healer. Yes, if I am a healer, I'll be using the dragonmark more often, but that makes sense. If I'm not a healer, I still gain a little healing edge, which is exactly the effect I'm looking for. I think the racial flexibility is potentially more problematic, but as it's only an option and not an actual setting element (e.g.: there are no dragonmarked dragonborn, by defualt), it's a painless feature. Rituals, baby! I know they're kind of the redheaded stepchild of 4e in a lot of campaigns, but it works well for the flavor of the dragonmark, I think.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 4883282, member: 2067"] I think the "ritual mastery" angle of the dragonmarks makes up for this. As a House Jorasco commoner, I can still learn and use the Remove Affliction ritual. For a random NPC from the street, this is pretty cool and pretty useful, in a setting context. This also makes the feat useful if I'm not already a healer. Yes, if I am a healer, I'll be using the dragonmark more often, but that makes sense. If I'm not a healer, I still gain a little healing edge, which is exactly the effect I'm looking for. I think the racial flexibility is potentially more problematic, but as it's only an option and not an actual setting element (e.g.: there are no dragonmarked dragonborn, by defualt), it's a painless feature. Rituals, baby! I know they're kind of the redheaded stepchild of 4e in a lot of campaigns, but it works well for the flavor of the dragonmark, I think. [/QUOTE]

Verification