Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Eberron: My issue with the 4e setting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="N0Man" data-source="post: 4886288" data-attributes="member: 64066"><p>The original post referenced wizards that can do all of those things? Is that so?</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>So, you would houserule it to allow for players, if the players wanted to choose a dragonmark for character and story reasons, if the restriction still existed.</p><p></p><p>If you were willing to houserule it that way, then why aren't you willing to houserule it the other way when a player comes up to you and just wants min-max a character without any consideration of the story implications that are clearly laid out in the book?</p><p></p><p>What you are effectively saying is that you're willing to houserule to encourage roleplaying but you aren't willing to houserule to discourage abusing a mechanic to min-max.</p><p></p><p>The only thing that removing the restriction does is to assume that people are being reasonable and using the marks the marks for story reasons, instead of assuming they are going to be chosen to min-max a character. This allows for characters who really want to play a different character concept, for story and roleplaying reasons, to be stopped by a DM who says, "sorry, the rules don't allow for this."</p><p></p><p>Really, the only thing removing the limitation does is to turn the table so that a DM only needs to step in to limit the abuse of the mechanic, rather than having to step in to allow a player to roleplay something interesting. I think that's a step forward.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="N0Man, post: 4886288, member: 64066"] The original post referenced wizards that can do all of those things? Is that so? So, you would houserule it to allow for players, if the players wanted to choose a dragonmark for character and story reasons, if the restriction still existed. If you were willing to houserule it that way, then why aren't you willing to houserule it the other way when a player comes up to you and just wants min-max a character without any consideration of the story implications that are clearly laid out in the book? What you are effectively saying is that you're willing to houserule to encourage roleplaying but you aren't willing to houserule to discourage abusing a mechanic to min-max. The only thing that removing the restriction does is to assume that people are being reasonable and using the marks the marks for story reasons, instead of assuming they are going to be chosen to min-max a character. This allows for characters who really want to play a different character concept, for story and roleplaying reasons, to be stopped by a DM who says, "sorry, the rules don't allow for this." Really, the only thing removing the limitation does is to turn the table so that a DM only needs to step in to limit the abuse of the mechanic, rather than having to step in to allow a player to roleplay something interesting. I think that's a step forward. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Eberron: My issue with the 4e setting
Top