Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="satori01" data-source="post: 881966" data-attributes="member: 7859">hmm let me think about that..... err NO. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />It deviates too much from standard rules.  The spell casting attributes are pretty much set in stone, and make a logical sense.A negative modifer is a negative modifier and makes a logical sense.  This would lead to the confussion of old AC rules. "wait you mean my +3 chainmail make my AC better by making it a negative while this cursed -2 shield makes my AC worse by adding positive bonuses to my AC"The Kir Lanans are a bad example as one could argue that they are a poorly conceived race in an optional book  that will probably never be made OGC.  The Kir Lanans are an exceptional case where prohibitions are being made to keep true to the flavor of the race.Gensai are simply put thematicaly poorly designed.  Tieflings and Aasimar seem like they should, Angelicaly blessed or Fiendishly touched.  Gensai are just cookie cutter pieced together.  The Fire Gensai should just be redesigned.  As an aside it would be very easy to justify a cha bonus for fire gensai, after all what other of the classic four elements has so captured Humanities imagination.  Not very many people have an obsession with dirt clods,  but a whole hell of a lot like playing with fire. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification