Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
ECL Races, EVER worth it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Serathin" data-source="post: 2442633" data-attributes="member: 34677"><p>First, I should note that EL is supposed to measure something OTHER than combat ability - total character effectiveness. For example, having a phylactery does not make a lich more effective in combat, but it is definitely worth EL.</p><p> </p><p>Second, as noted earlier, monster HD are unequal, and this has been expressed in 3.5 rules for increasing CR as HD increases.</p><p> </p><p>In particular, dragon and outsiders are solid.</p><p> </p><p>If there were a character class that gave NOTHING but:</p><p> </p><p>3 good saves, full BAB, d12 HP, and 6 skill points (or d8 HP and 8 skill points for outsiders, and decent skill access), it'd be worth taking 1 or 2 levels of even without any special abilities.</p><p> </p><p>Second, it's not always true that EL is not worth it. Generally, and special abilities like spell likes or supernatural abilities that do NOT SCALE BY LEVEL, make an LA race not worth it. LA deriving from spell like abilities, or flat-DC effects, or effects with DCs that increase by HD but not by class levels also, generally become worthless. Abilities that do scale MAY be worth it.</p><p> </p><p>The biggest notable issue in LA is that it hurts spellcasting classes far more than non-casters, like fighters and rogues. A well designed fighter/rogue (or fighter-rogue) can benefit from the LA class if the abilities mesh well. For example, a pixie rogue/sniper...</p><p> </p><p>The other issue is that most of the comparisons I've seen pit low level LA creatures against low-mid level characters. However, this does not take into account the fact that the base classes are heavily front loaded. Thus, fighter/rogues with LA don't really come into their own until they have at least 4 to 8 class levels.</p><p> </p><p>Finally, LA derived from stat increases and other stackable bonuses can be worth it - but it depends how much. At high levels, half dragon can be decent. +8 STR, +2 Con, Int, Cha, +4 natural armor, possible winged flight... For 3 LA, is probably fair. (Note that I'm completely ignoring the breath weapon, which is worthless beyond level 5). Half dragon, as a template, also lets you keep the base race bonuses, like human. Classes like Aasimar are NOT worth it, however. They receive 4 stat points for one level and lose base race bonuses... In our game, we made aasimar a template (so you get the human bonuses AND the aasimar bonuses for 1 LA), and it's still questionable whether it's worth it. (For that matter, anyone who thinks the elf bonuses are even vaguely comparable to the human bonuses has serious issues...)</p><p> </p><p>The real problem with LA is that the specific LA values given are often just way off base.</p><p> </p><p>I'm not sure the fact that LA races make poor spellcasters is a bad thing... it does mean that the most magical races (in terms of learned or acquired magic, rather than innate magic) are the ones with lowest hit dice, and that's important for the game genre. It just means that no one will ever actually play a giant=priest (do you know what the LA of the cloud giant priest in the book is?!?!?!)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Serathin, post: 2442633, member: 34677"] First, I should note that EL is supposed to measure something OTHER than combat ability - total character effectiveness. For example, having a phylactery does not make a lich more effective in combat, but it is definitely worth EL. Second, as noted earlier, monster HD are unequal, and this has been expressed in 3.5 rules for increasing CR as HD increases. In particular, dragon and outsiders are solid. If there were a character class that gave NOTHING but: 3 good saves, full BAB, d12 HP, and 6 skill points (or d8 HP and 8 skill points for outsiders, and decent skill access), it'd be worth taking 1 or 2 levels of even without any special abilities. Second, it's not always true that EL is not worth it. Generally, and special abilities like spell likes or supernatural abilities that do NOT SCALE BY LEVEL, make an LA race not worth it. LA deriving from spell like abilities, or flat-DC effects, or effects with DCs that increase by HD but not by class levels also, generally become worthless. Abilities that do scale MAY be worth it. The biggest notable issue in LA is that it hurts spellcasting classes far more than non-casters, like fighters and rogues. A well designed fighter/rogue (or fighter-rogue) can benefit from the LA class if the abilities mesh well. For example, a pixie rogue/sniper... The other issue is that most of the comparisons I've seen pit low level LA creatures against low-mid level characters. However, this does not take into account the fact that the base classes are heavily front loaded. Thus, fighter/rogues with LA don't really come into their own until they have at least 4 to 8 class levels. Finally, LA derived from stat increases and other stackable bonuses can be worth it - but it depends how much. At high levels, half dragon can be decent. +8 STR, +2 Con, Int, Cha, +4 natural armor, possible winged flight... For 3 LA, is probably fair. (Note that I'm completely ignoring the breath weapon, which is worthless beyond level 5). Half dragon, as a template, also lets you keep the base race bonuses, like human. Classes like Aasimar are NOT worth it, however. They receive 4 stat points for one level and lose base race bonuses... In our game, we made aasimar a template (so you get the human bonuses AND the aasimar bonuses for 1 LA), and it's still questionable whether it's worth it. (For that matter, anyone who thinks the elf bonuses are even vaguely comparable to the human bonuses has serious issues...) The real problem with LA is that the specific LA values given are often just way off base. I'm not sure the fact that LA races make poor spellcasters is a bad thing... it does mean that the most magical races (in terms of learned or acquired magic, rather than innate magic) are the ones with lowest hit dice, and that's important for the game genre. It just means that no one will ever actually play a giant=priest (do you know what the LA of the cloud giant priest in the book is?!?!?!) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
ECL Races, EVER worth it?
Top