Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Edition Bias and 4e Sales Perception
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NewJeffCT" data-source="post: 4756949" data-attributes="member: 10784"><p><strong>I'm neutral on 4E</strong></p><p></p><p>I was a year into a 3.5 campaign when 4E came out, and since I'm so focused on that as a DM, I have barely perused the 4E books. So, I have no opinion on 4E. I told the group that I planned on finishing the campaign in 3.5, then deciding if we should stick with 3.5 for the next campaign, or move on to 3.75/Pathfinder or on to 4E and that was fine with everybody.</p><p></p><p>When 3E came out in 2000, there was a clear need for a new edition. While 2E had its good points, it had become so big, unwieldy and inconsistent that it was hard to find two groups that played it exactly the same. Plus, since it had been a decade since 2E came out, things had stagnated in terms of books for so many different gaming worlds - FR, Greyhawk, Ravenloft, Planescape, Dragonlance, Spelljammer, etc, etc - that with kits and skills & powers and so on it was a huge change from the original 2E that came out in 1989 or 1990. People were hungry for change, and 3E was it.</p><p></p><p>With 4E, I don't think there was a clear need for a new edition. While 3.5 was becoming unwieldy with prestige classes, new core classes, new skills & feats, etc, it was still not to the point where it was unplayable and unrecognizable when compared to the original 3.5. While many had problems with aspects of 3.5, I did not see a huge demand for change out there among gamers. And, if you did not like 3.5, you could always go back to 3E, 2E or 1E as an alternate, or make a few house rules to 3.5 to fix things you didn't like... I know my old group literally had a book of 2E house rules, but far less for 3E and 3.5. (And, don't get me wrong, I have many fond memories of 1E and 2E...)</p><p></p><p>that is my opinion at least. I understand that Hasbro needs to make money, but I think pushing out a 4E is more of a short-term decision than a long term one. They know a new edition will generate a bump in sales for the new books and first several new products... I think 3.5 was still a few years away from being unworkable and in need of change. And, I would have hoped that 4E would have been more like the change from 1E to 2E.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NewJeffCT, post: 4756949, member: 10784"] [b]I'm neutral on 4E[/b] I was a year into a 3.5 campaign when 4E came out, and since I'm so focused on that as a DM, I have barely perused the 4E books. So, I have no opinion on 4E. I told the group that I planned on finishing the campaign in 3.5, then deciding if we should stick with 3.5 for the next campaign, or move on to 3.75/Pathfinder or on to 4E and that was fine with everybody. When 3E came out in 2000, there was a clear need for a new edition. While 2E had its good points, it had become so big, unwieldy and inconsistent that it was hard to find two groups that played it exactly the same. Plus, since it had been a decade since 2E came out, things had stagnated in terms of books for so many different gaming worlds - FR, Greyhawk, Ravenloft, Planescape, Dragonlance, Spelljammer, etc, etc - that with kits and skills & powers and so on it was a huge change from the original 2E that came out in 1989 or 1990. People were hungry for change, and 3E was it. With 4E, I don't think there was a clear need for a new edition. While 3.5 was becoming unwieldy with prestige classes, new core classes, new skills & feats, etc, it was still not to the point where it was unplayable and unrecognizable when compared to the original 3.5. While many had problems with aspects of 3.5, I did not see a huge demand for change out there among gamers. And, if you did not like 3.5, you could always go back to 3E, 2E or 1E as an alternate, or make a few house rules to 3.5 to fix things you didn't like... I know my old group literally had a book of 2E house rules, but far less for 3E and 3.5. (And, don't get me wrong, I have many fond memories of 1E and 2E...) that is my opinion at least. I understand that Hasbro needs to make money, but I think pushing out a 4E is more of a short-term decision than a long term one. They know a new edition will generate a bump in sales for the new books and first several new products... I think 3.5 was still a few years away from being unworkable and in need of change. And, I would have hoped that 4E would have been more like the change from 1E to 2E. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Edition Bias and 4e Sales Perception
Top