Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Edition Design Philosophies as Seen Through Magic Items
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pamphylian" data-source="post: 9885066" data-attributes="member: 7053769"><p>Yeah, a lot of costs/risks have been removed from spells - e.g. lots of spells (haste, wish, restoration, gate, etc.) age the caster in 1e, I suppose also implying a system shock check. Raise Dead lowers Constitution etc. It is always nice when you see a 5e spell that still has a hint of risk/surprising consequence: Teleport can have mishaps, getting hit by Prismatic spray can send you to a random plane, Reincarnate can bring you back as a random race... nice to see little idiosyncracies nodding to Vancianism still lingering when many spells have had the rough edges and quirks sanded off.</p><p></p><p>The need to codify everything in a preset condition I think is a lot of my issue with 5e magic. Preset Conditions are great as an efficient, memorable way to package effects - used well, they can actually reduce the mental burden of abstractions and keep the focus in the game world. But I think they can degrade things when designers assume just about everything has to fit into one of the preset conditions, or (even worse), think of the condition first, and ignore whats going in world, or assume textual flavor has no bearing on the effect beyond the condition.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, stuff like a crossbow in your face is tough to abstract with the 5e hp system as written. I usually assume hp are a mix of luck, fatigue, and superficial wounds - reading old records of premodern battles, you do hear of armored soldiers get hit with multiple arrows, be fatigued and lightly wounded, and be able to carry on fighting, but still need healing after battle. That's the sort of image I have in my head.</p><p></p><p>I think the crossbow situation and a lot of other pathologies of the hp abstraction are helped by alternate routes to death beyond the hp to zero -> death saves. 5e has Max hp reduction, disintegration, and ability score damage with the score going to zero instantly killing you, but these are relatively rare, and the first two still need to eat through hp. It's why the Strength drain of e.g. Shadows is so refreshing as a monster ability. I think the earlier edition Save or Die (from e.g. poison) effects represented this sort of routing around hp - even if you are beefy, the right poison doesn't care about your ability to not get hit. 3e (I believe) actually had a possibly 5e compatible way of implementing the crossbow to the face with the Coup de Grace, with some nice preconditions/risks:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]433047[/ATTACH]</p><p>I'd prefer to have something like this than contrive something like a super high damage crossbow bolt just for the occasion - as an abstraction that keeps hp in its proper place, this sort of thing would sit better with me.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The 5e 2014 DMG at least (maybe 2024 too?) does have a nice optional lingering injuries table (with limb loss, eye loss, festering wounds, etc.), and they are pretty good as far as these things go - give some nice justification to the Restoration spell! But yeah, because it is optional, it becomes mainly a DM fiat sort of thing, the effects are almost never worked into spells/items/monsters.</p><p></p><p>I'm not actually a DM that is extremely into ultra punishing lingering effects all the time, but I do like that it broadens the scope of possible effects, and marries numerical changes to concrete effects. I think the ideal is having a good spread of durations across different effects - some lasting a round, some an encounter, some a 10 minute dungeon turn, some a day, some days, some weeks, etc to give different sorts of weight to consequences. But this really goes from hassle to making the campaign feel more alive when time (at multiple scales) matters, semi-regular downtime is expected, and there is an expectation that players have a stable of characters they can draw from when their character is out of commission for a few weeks - aspects of the game that have either less rule support or less of a play culture supporting them in the current edition.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pamphylian, post: 9885066, member: 7053769"] Yeah, a lot of costs/risks have been removed from spells - e.g. lots of spells (haste, wish, restoration, gate, etc.) age the caster in 1e, I suppose also implying a system shock check. Raise Dead lowers Constitution etc. It is always nice when you see a 5e spell that still has a hint of risk/surprising consequence: Teleport can have mishaps, getting hit by Prismatic spray can send you to a random plane, Reincarnate can bring you back as a random race... nice to see little idiosyncracies nodding to Vancianism still lingering when many spells have had the rough edges and quirks sanded off. The need to codify everything in a preset condition I think is a lot of my issue with 5e magic. Preset Conditions are great as an efficient, memorable way to package effects - used well, they can actually reduce the mental burden of abstractions and keep the focus in the game world. But I think they can degrade things when designers assume just about everything has to fit into one of the preset conditions, or (even worse), think of the condition first, and ignore whats going in world, or assume textual flavor has no bearing on the effect beyond the condition. Yeah, stuff like a crossbow in your face is tough to abstract with the 5e hp system as written. I usually assume hp are a mix of luck, fatigue, and superficial wounds - reading old records of premodern battles, you do hear of armored soldiers get hit with multiple arrows, be fatigued and lightly wounded, and be able to carry on fighting, but still need healing after battle. That's the sort of image I have in my head. I think the crossbow situation and a lot of other pathologies of the hp abstraction are helped by alternate routes to death beyond the hp to zero -> death saves. 5e has Max hp reduction, disintegration, and ability score damage with the score going to zero instantly killing you, but these are relatively rare, and the first two still need to eat through hp. It's why the Strength drain of e.g. Shadows is so refreshing as a monster ability. I think the earlier edition Save or Die (from e.g. poison) effects represented this sort of routing around hp - even if you are beefy, the right poison doesn't care about your ability to not get hit. 3e (I believe) actually had a possibly 5e compatible way of implementing the crossbow to the face with the Coup de Grace, with some nice preconditions/risks: [ATTACH type="full" alt="1774664752951.png"]433047[/ATTACH] I'd prefer to have something like this than contrive something like a super high damage crossbow bolt just for the occasion - as an abstraction that keeps hp in its proper place, this sort of thing would sit better with me. The 5e 2014 DMG at least (maybe 2024 too?) does have a nice optional lingering injuries table (with limb loss, eye loss, festering wounds, etc.), and they are pretty good as far as these things go - give some nice justification to the Restoration spell! But yeah, because it is optional, it becomes mainly a DM fiat sort of thing, the effects are almost never worked into spells/items/monsters. I'm not actually a DM that is extremely into ultra punishing lingering effects all the time, but I do like that it broadens the scope of possible effects, and marries numerical changes to concrete effects. I think the ideal is having a good spread of durations across different effects - some lasting a round, some an encounter, some a 10 minute dungeon turn, some a day, some days, some weeks, etc to give different sorts of weight to consequences. But this really goes from hassle to making the campaign feel more alive when time (at multiple scales) matters, semi-regular downtime is expected, and there is an expectation that players have a stable of characters they can draw from when their character is out of commission for a few weeks - aspects of the game that have either less rule support or less of a play culture supporting them in the current edition. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Edition Design Philosophies as Seen Through Magic Items
Top