Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Edition war?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 4979990" data-attributes="member: 15538"><p>Regarding <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/4978222-post10.html" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/4978222-post10.html</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I didn't see red ink so I hope this acceptable to discuss here. Umbran, I'm having a hard time seeing an edition war here. "Tyranny of X" is a pretty common expression. It's a use of personification in which an object is portrayed as having the characteristics of a despotic ruler. The poster wasn't insulting any person. He was expressing how he felt about 4e in play.</p><p></p><p>As the thread as in in open, wasn't marked as a "fans only" thread, and did not in the OP specify or imply a positive approach, I would imagine a plurality of viewpoints would be acceptable. Why is it okay to say 4e streamlined the game for actual play, but not that it's tyrannical? Isn't that very close to saying that only people who think 4e's design was an improvement are allowed to express their opinion?</p><p></p><p>I know at one time the moderation was tuned to a very sensitive level of heat, but I thought we were sort of past that. I would appreciate some clarification whether Umbran's response was a friendly warning, a "smoke alarm" post, or indication that the post responded to was considered out of bounds on this site. I took the post as a sort of "tread carefully" thing but the more I thought it, the more I wasn't sure what the intent was.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pawsplay, post: 4979990, member: 15538"] Regarding [url]http://www.enworld.org/forum/4978222-post10.html[/url] I didn't see red ink so I hope this acceptable to discuss here. Umbran, I'm having a hard time seeing an edition war here. "Tyranny of X" is a pretty common expression. It's a use of personification in which an object is portrayed as having the characteristics of a despotic ruler. The poster wasn't insulting any person. He was expressing how he felt about 4e in play. As the thread as in in open, wasn't marked as a "fans only" thread, and did not in the OP specify or imply a positive approach, I would imagine a plurality of viewpoints would be acceptable. Why is it okay to say 4e streamlined the game for actual play, but not that it's tyrannical? Isn't that very close to saying that only people who think 4e's design was an improvement are allowed to express their opinion? I know at one time the moderation was tuned to a very sensitive level of heat, but I thought we were sort of past that. I would appreciate some clarification whether Umbran's response was a friendly warning, a "smoke alarm" post, or indication that the post responded to was considered out of bounds on this site. I took the post as a sort of "tread carefully" thing but the more I thought it, the more I wasn't sure what the intent was. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Edition war?
Top