Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Effective GM'ing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 545484" data-attributes="member: 177"><p><strong>Re: Part 1</strong></p><p></p><p>You want critique? Okay.... </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There are three major problems with this section.</p><p></p><p>The first is the personal anecdotal statement, "I have encountered so many...". It has two flaws - first, it depends on your own authority for it's validity (it is <em>your</em> experience that matters). But you've done absolutly nothing to support the assertion that you are an authority. Secondly, anecdotal evidence, personal or otherwise, is a lousy support for a position.</p><p></p><p>Market research from a fairly reasonable authority, WOTC, suggests the existance of a couple of million gamers. That implies some hundreds of thousands of GMs. You say you've seen "So many." How many? Is it a meaningful number out of those hundreds of thousands? Probably not. There are only very few people who can make believeable statements about large numbers of gamers and their tendencies. You haven't established yourself as one of them, rendering your position very weak.</p><p></p><p>The second problem is the thoroughly speculative nature of your conclusion: "Possibly...". Yes, possibly it's for the reason you state, but possibly not. Perhaps those GMs like to kill one PC a game because they simply like the tension created by high stakes and risks. The fact that you can state a possibility doesn't make it a fact, and nothing else you say supports the speculation as truth. Everything that follows that "possibly" is thus poorly supported.</p><p></p><p>Third comes the insulting nature of your speculation. You call it a "pathetic attempt". If a random person of no known pedigree were to call you pathetic, would you be particularly disposed to take his words to heart, or would you be more likely to be hostile to his point of view? Only rarely are insults a useful teaching tool.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 545484, member: 177"] [b]Re: Part 1[/b] You want critique? Okay.... There are three major problems with this section. The first is the personal anecdotal statement, "I have encountered so many...". It has two flaws - first, it depends on your own authority for it's validity (it is [i]your[/i] experience that matters). But you've done absolutly nothing to support the assertion that you are an authority. Secondly, anecdotal evidence, personal or otherwise, is a lousy support for a position. Market research from a fairly reasonable authority, WOTC, suggests the existance of a couple of million gamers. That implies some hundreds of thousands of GMs. You say you've seen "So many." How many? Is it a meaningful number out of those hundreds of thousands? Probably not. There are only very few people who can make believeable statements about large numbers of gamers and their tendencies. You haven't established yourself as one of them, rendering your position very weak. The second problem is the thoroughly speculative nature of your conclusion: "Possibly...". Yes, possibly it's for the reason you state, but possibly not. Perhaps those GMs like to kill one PC a game because they simply like the tension created by high stakes and risks. The fact that you can state a possibility doesn't make it a fact, and nothing else you say supports the speculation as truth. Everything that follows that "possibly" is thus poorly supported. Third comes the insulting nature of your speculation. You call it a "pathetic attempt". If a random person of no known pedigree were to call you pathetic, would you be particularly disposed to take his words to heart, or would you be more likely to be hostile to his point of view? Only rarely are insults a useful teaching tool. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Effective GM'ing
Top