Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Egyptians with Medieval Technology
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rabelais" data-source="post: 1831399" data-attributes="member: 2969"><p><strong>In addition</strong></p><p></p><p>Yes, Egypt was a theocracy, but more to the point the Pharaoh was himself a god. If you really want to add some spice, give your Pharaohs divine ranks.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The concept of the divinity of the Egyptian rulers began early in the development of the Old Kingdom. The rulers Scorpion and Narmer, approximately 3050-3000B.C.E, were depicted in inscriptions as larger than those around them, suggesting that they were gods among men. Myths supported the divinity of the “Good King” and his responsibility for maintaining order. Osiris had been the rightful ruler of Egypt, his wicked brother Seth slew him, and dismembered his body. His son Horus, sought revenge against Seth for the murder of his father. Horus defeated Seth, and became the rightful king. “Thus every king of Egypt was the earthly embodiment of Horus. He overcame Seth (evil, disorder, and chaos) and preserved ma’at. (Ancient Near Eastern History and Culture William H. Stiebing jr. p. 116)”</p><p></p><p>The concept of Ma’at is the justification for political stability in Egypt. Ma’at represents the cardinal virtues of stable rulership, truth, order, balance, harmony, wisdom and justice (Stiebing, p114). The king ruled through this concept, and in counterbalance, the concept is maintained through him in return. The divine kings (Nisut Bity, or “King of Upper and Lower Egypt”) were the personification of Ma’at and in that capacity maintained a sort of “common law” approach to their decrees. On page 116, Stiebing states that “He was expected to uphold ma’at. His legal decisions followed traditional concepts of personal rights, fairness and justice designed to maintain the status quo.” The king maintained the natural order, and kept the forces of chaos at bay (Stiebing p.117).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's more, but the rest of my paper has to do with the Akkadians and the rulers of the Third Dynasty of Ur.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rabelais, post: 1831399, member: 2969"] [b]In addition[/b] Yes, Egypt was a theocracy, but more to the point the Pharaoh was himself a god. If you really want to add some spice, give your Pharaohs divine ranks. The concept of the divinity of the Egyptian rulers began early in the development of the Old Kingdom. The rulers Scorpion and Narmer, approximately 3050-3000B.C.E, were depicted in inscriptions as larger than those around them, suggesting that they were gods among men. Myths supported the divinity of the “Good King” and his responsibility for maintaining order. Osiris had been the rightful ruler of Egypt, his wicked brother Seth slew him, and dismembered his body. His son Horus, sought revenge against Seth for the murder of his father. Horus defeated Seth, and became the rightful king. “Thus every king of Egypt was the earthly embodiment of Horus. He overcame Seth (evil, disorder, and chaos) and preserved ma’at. (Ancient Near Eastern History and Culture William H. Stiebing jr. p. 116)” The concept of Ma’at is the justification for political stability in Egypt. Ma’at represents the cardinal virtues of stable rulership, truth, order, balance, harmony, wisdom and justice (Stiebing, p114). The king ruled through this concept, and in counterbalance, the concept is maintained through him in return. The divine kings (Nisut Bity, or “King of Upper and Lower Egypt”) were the personification of Ma’at and in that capacity maintained a sort of “common law” approach to their decrees. On page 116, Stiebing states that “He was expected to uphold ma’at. His legal decisions followed traditional concepts of personal rights, fairness and justice designed to maintain the status quo.” The king maintained the natural order, and kept the forces of chaos at bay (Stiebing p.117). There's more, but the rest of my paper has to do with the Akkadians and the rulers of the Third Dynasty of Ur. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Egyptians with Medieval Technology
Top