Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Eight is Enough: How Many Classes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SSquirrel" data-source="post: 3873344" data-attributes="member: 5202"><p>Sorry Lab_Monkey, I've never been into Rangers and think if they were choosing a class to get the axe for PH1 it's a good start. Rangers have never really felt like they were worth having as a class to themselves to me, TSR/WotC have never really staked a great claim to the gaming space for them IMO. Yes I know a certain Drow is a Ranger, but Rangers can be accomplished just fine w/fighters having a broader skill base. </p><p></p><p>Don't even get me started on the poor spell selection/casting attached to the Ranger (or the Paladin or somehow the Assassin for that matter). No Ranger I've ever played with really ever used their spells for much, they could have been given much more useful other abilities.</p><p></p><p>Rogue, Cleric, Wizard, Fighter. 4 or more others. Paladins and Rangers are prestige classes at best. Sorcerors can go away happily. I'm one who would like to see Psionics around and actually core, but I don't see it happening really. Monks don't need to be core, Bards can be provided they're done better than 3E had them. 3.5 Bards were a good deal better. but still more likely to get passed over among my circle of gamer friends. I tried making a 3E Bard work in one of my friend's games, but I'll admit it wasn't a campaign that played to the Bard's strong suits <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Really, do we need more than 4 classes? Psionics can be covered ala Arcana Evolved w/flavor feats, and most of the classes in the game are basically a blending in different measures of the 4 base classes. Having effectively designed talent trees to allow people to go to different class extremes would be more than enough really. Less space devoted to character classes, more space spent on important things. Like all the gnomes of the world being put thru an abattoir <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SSquirrel, post: 3873344, member: 5202"] Sorry Lab_Monkey, I've never been into Rangers and think if they were choosing a class to get the axe for PH1 it's a good start. Rangers have never really felt like they were worth having as a class to themselves to me, TSR/WotC have never really staked a great claim to the gaming space for them IMO. Yes I know a certain Drow is a Ranger, but Rangers can be accomplished just fine w/fighters having a broader skill base. Don't even get me started on the poor spell selection/casting attached to the Ranger (or the Paladin or somehow the Assassin for that matter). No Ranger I've ever played with really ever used their spells for much, they could have been given much more useful other abilities. Rogue, Cleric, Wizard, Fighter. 4 or more others. Paladins and Rangers are prestige classes at best. Sorcerors can go away happily. I'm one who would like to see Psionics around and actually core, but I don't see it happening really. Monks don't need to be core, Bards can be provided they're done better than 3E had them. 3.5 Bards were a good deal better. but still more likely to get passed over among my circle of gamer friends. I tried making a 3E Bard work in one of my friend's games, but I'll admit it wasn't a campaign that played to the Bard's strong suits ;) Really, do we need more than 4 classes? Psionics can be covered ala Arcana Evolved w/flavor feats, and most of the classes in the game are basically a blending in different measures of the 4 base classes. Having effectively designed talent trees to allow people to go to different class extremes would be more than enough really. Less space devoted to character classes, more space spent on important things. Like all the gnomes of the world being put thru an abattoir ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Eight is Enough: How Many Classes?
Top