Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Eladrin, warlords, and unnecessary D&Disms
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rounser" data-source="post: 3842404" data-attributes="member: 1106"><p>Another WOTC creation, another badly chosen name for a core part of the PHB. </p><p></p><p>Concept of a leader class and a fey magic elf race - great, no problem with that. The names, warlord and eladrin, don't work for me. Why can't they just use classic, generic fantasy names? Why are they getting ridiculous (warlord) and arbitrary (eladrin) with them? Why are we getting more D&Disms in the core, as if the cleric wasn't enough?</p><p></p><p>This is D&D, WOTC, and you're spiked chaining it further into D&Dism territory. It'll map even less to classic swords & sorcery fantasy tropes, because you'll have to explain to newcomers that warlords don't have armies, and what the heck an eladrin is, and so on. You're polluting the implied setting by making this stuff core. </p><p></p><p>D&D is already full of D&Disms, but generally they're optional and can be ignored, by not using that supplement. By moving them to centre stage and putting them in the PHB you don't even really give people an option to ban them, because it's a pain in the neck to state that such and such parts of the PHB don't apply to this campaign. Or have to put up with the annoyance of reading "eladrin" and "warlord" every time if you rename them.</p><p></p><p>I understand that WOTC wants to give the game a shake-up, but for something as minor as names, it's just so trivial to do a good job with something classic and generic instead of putting a sore thumb into every campaign out there. </p><p></p><p>A lot of people play D&D as a sort of Sim S&S Fantasy World game, and by pushing your brand as a specific, non-generic entity with a specific, extremely quirky implied setting you may find that aspect of D&D's ability to deliver on that suffering. Thus far it's hewed fairly closely to Tolkien, who stuck to mythology, which was okay (everyone knows what a dwarf is)...</p><p></p><p>...but now we're going all Planescape and WoW. "Fey elf" and "demonic blooded human" and "leader" have mythic resonance as tropes, but the names chosen to represent them need an overhaul IMO.</p><p></p><p>As if the implied setting wasn't already quirky and idiosyncratic enough...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rounser, post: 3842404, member: 1106"] Another WOTC creation, another badly chosen name for a core part of the PHB. Concept of a leader class and a fey magic elf race - great, no problem with that. The names, warlord and eladrin, don't work for me. Why can't they just use classic, generic fantasy names? Why are they getting ridiculous (warlord) and arbitrary (eladrin) with them? Why are we getting more D&Disms in the core, as if the cleric wasn't enough? This is D&D, WOTC, and you're spiked chaining it further into D&Dism territory. It'll map even less to classic swords & sorcery fantasy tropes, because you'll have to explain to newcomers that warlords don't have armies, and what the heck an eladrin is, and so on. You're polluting the implied setting by making this stuff core. D&D is already full of D&Disms, but generally they're optional and can be ignored, by not using that supplement. By moving them to centre stage and putting them in the PHB you don't even really give people an option to ban them, because it's a pain in the neck to state that such and such parts of the PHB don't apply to this campaign. Or have to put up with the annoyance of reading "eladrin" and "warlord" every time if you rename them. I understand that WOTC wants to give the game a shake-up, but for something as minor as names, it's just so trivial to do a good job with something classic and generic instead of putting a sore thumb into every campaign out there. A lot of people play D&D as a sort of Sim S&S Fantasy World game, and by pushing your brand as a specific, non-generic entity with a specific, extremely quirky implied setting you may find that aspect of D&D's ability to deliver on that suffering. Thus far it's hewed fairly closely to Tolkien, who stuck to mythology, which was okay (everyone knows what a dwarf is)... ...but now we're going all Planescape and WoW. "Fey elf" and "demonic blooded human" and "leader" have mythic resonance as tropes, but the names chosen to represent them need an overhaul IMO. As if the implied setting wasn't already quirky and idiosyncratic enough... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Eladrin, warlords, and unnecessary D&Disms
Top