Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Electronic Voice Phenomena: Terrifying.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Torm" data-source="post: 1765478" data-attributes="member: 12706"><p>Very well, I will use Science and Art, since you are right, it amounts to the same thing for my purposes here, and provides a beautiful way to illustrate my point.</p><p></p><p>Science is frequently best described as math, and for a lot of people, that math is very boring. BUT, to someone who can understand the math, an equation that is both functional, eloquent, and minimalist to achieve the desired effect can be quite beautiful - a veritable work of Art. And frequently graphic illustrations of the math ARE Art.</p><p></p><p>On the flipside of that, we percieve people, sounds, and images - that is to say, Art - as beautiful or ugly, emotive or not, and when emotive, emotive of happiness or sadness or melancholy, etc. Our presence Science has some equations that, while budding, are beginning to be pretty effective at determining whether, on the whole, people will find a particular thing beautiful or what-have-you, through simple math. The Golden Mean is a good example. But just because we can do that, and probably will do it better and better, as time goes on, doesn't make it NOT Art anymore - science and art don't negate one another.</p><p></p><p>The notion that Art (or religion) are negated by being explainable by science is hogwash. I understand the biology of human reproduction extremely well, but that made my children's births no less a miracle. I understand the astronomy and atmospheric science behind a beautiful sunrise, but it is no less a work of Art for that. To use your terminolgy, your intuition was clearly wrong if it disagrees after the fact with what you then know could have been discovered by observation. And vice-versa. And if that is not true, either your means of observation or your means of intuition (or both) are broken. It is ALL one thing, and it makes sense that the varied ways of studying that one thing agree.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Torm, post: 1765478, member: 12706"] Very well, I will use Science and Art, since you are right, it amounts to the same thing for my purposes here, and provides a beautiful way to illustrate my point. Science is frequently best described as math, and for a lot of people, that math is very boring. BUT, to someone who can understand the math, an equation that is both functional, eloquent, and minimalist to achieve the desired effect can be quite beautiful - a veritable work of Art. And frequently graphic illustrations of the math ARE Art. On the flipside of that, we percieve people, sounds, and images - that is to say, Art - as beautiful or ugly, emotive or not, and when emotive, emotive of happiness or sadness or melancholy, etc. Our presence Science has some equations that, while budding, are beginning to be pretty effective at determining whether, on the whole, people will find a particular thing beautiful or what-have-you, through simple math. The Golden Mean is a good example. But just because we can do that, and probably will do it better and better, as time goes on, doesn't make it NOT Art anymore - science and art don't negate one another. The notion that Art (or religion) are negated by being explainable by science is hogwash. I understand the biology of human reproduction extremely well, but that made my children's births no less a miracle. I understand the astronomy and atmospheric science behind a beautiful sunrise, but it is no less a work of Art for that. To use your terminolgy, your intuition was clearly wrong if it disagrees after the fact with what you then know could have been discovered by observation. And vice-versa. And if that is not true, either your means of observation or your means of intuition (or both) are broken. It is ALL one thing, and it makes sense that the varied ways of studying that one thing agree. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Electronic Voice Phenomena: Terrifying.
Top