Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Elegance and the development of game systems.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 4971799" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>In the realm of the sciences - mathematics and physics, specifically - there is a concept to "elegance" that is a bit difficult to define. You know it when you see it, but it roughly goes, "beauty and simplicity in basic formulation".</p><p></p><p>Maxwell's Equations, Schrödinger's Equation, Newton's Laws of Motion, are all of the "elegant" class. They have symmetries, and say things such that some fundamental basic truths just flow out of them. If you pick up Maxwell's equations, the wave nature of light just sort of falls into your lap with no work to speak of</p><p></p><p>Are they complete? Well, each of them is complete at what it sets out to do, yes. Newton's laws fully cover the motion of objects in flat, non-relativistic space, for example. And they're all pretty clear on what realms they do cover.</p><p></p><p>Are they flexible? Well, here's where we learn something important - "elegance" does not mean, "is always easy to use in practice". Newton's laws of motion are complete, but if you try to solve the three-body gravitational problem (like, three planets in orbit around one another) the math is generally insoluble. And any grad student that has tried to derive the electric potential field around an array of current-carrying wires can tell you that in practice the math is a vicious critter.</p><p></p><p>I think this is carried out into other realms. A woman may have a beautiful, elegant gown. As soon as I say that, though, you know I am talking about a dress that she would not wear to work in the garden, cook dinner in, or to swing-dance. Elegance <em>in no way</em> implies practicality or functionality. Often quite the opposite is true. Typically, the way to get solid, day to day functionality out of a thing is to veer away from elegance. </p><p></p><p>As an aside - To my my way of thinking, appeals to DM fiat are not elegant. That's like the physicist writing, "and then a miracle occurs," on the blackboard. Maybe what happens in that section is smooth, and maybe it isn't - whatever it is, it certainly isn't attributable to merits of the system.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 4971799, member: 177"] In the realm of the sciences - mathematics and physics, specifically - there is a concept to "elegance" that is a bit difficult to define. You know it when you see it, but it roughly goes, "beauty and simplicity in basic formulation". Maxwell's Equations, Schrödinger's Equation, Newton's Laws of Motion, are all of the "elegant" class. They have symmetries, and say things such that some fundamental basic truths just flow out of them. If you pick up Maxwell's equations, the wave nature of light just sort of falls into your lap with no work to speak of Are they complete? Well, each of them is complete at what it sets out to do, yes. Newton's laws fully cover the motion of objects in flat, non-relativistic space, for example. And they're all pretty clear on what realms they do cover. Are they flexible? Well, here's where we learn something important - "elegance" does not mean, "is always easy to use in practice". Newton's laws of motion are complete, but if you try to solve the three-body gravitational problem (like, three planets in orbit around one another) the math is generally insoluble. And any grad student that has tried to derive the electric potential field around an array of current-carrying wires can tell you that in practice the math is a vicious critter. I think this is carried out into other realms. A woman may have a beautiful, elegant gown. As soon as I say that, though, you know I am talking about a dress that she would not wear to work in the garden, cook dinner in, or to swing-dance. Elegance [I]in no way[/I] implies practicality or functionality. Often quite the opposite is true. Typically, the way to get solid, day to day functionality out of a thing is to veer away from elegance. As an aside - To my my way of thinking, appeals to DM fiat are not elegant. That's like the physicist writing, "and then a miracle occurs," on the blackboard. Maybe what happens in that section is smooth, and maybe it isn't - whatever it is, it certainly isn't attributable to merits of the system. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Elegance and the development of game systems.
Top