Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kramodlog" data-source="post: 7663197" data-attributes="member: 55961">Like there is no paticular reason to believe Kettie leaked it or that is was all an accident. Well, actually, since it happened twice, an accident or doing it without WotC's consent seems less likely. WotC's guards its secret, don't you agree? And they aren't afraid to warn people with C&D letters. Why wouldn't they have warn Kettie to stop the leaks in August? Why give them the covers of the books in January knowing they can't be trusted? Something doesn't add-up.Actually, as I showed, someone can make a leak volontarely. To repeat myself film executives, politicians, corporations do it all the time. Merriam-webster's definition supports that. WotC could have done it as a marketing strategy. That you disagree with this sort of strategy doesn't mean that WotC didn't do it. What would make it untrue is WotC saying Kettie leaked it or Kettie saying "we leaked it without WotC's consent." None of these statements have been made so far. I do not think they will be made either. So we are left with speculations.Just like saying Kettie did it without WotC's consent. That is my point. That both are speculation. That is the crux of my argument. I'm not sure why this is not clear. No. It is your opinion. Nothing wrong with opinions, except claiming they are facts.The amount of correct leaks indicate your opinion is not factual. The problem with your opinion is that you start with the premise that leaks cannot be factual.</blockquote>

Verification