Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Elemental Planes Killed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="see" data-source="post: 3788810" data-attributes="member: 10531"><p>I would be perfectly fine with that. All the reference to them in the three AD&D 1e core books was being named in the PHB, showing up on the PHB's planar diagram, and a couple passing mentions in spell/magic item/monster descriptions. The original 3e core books had a sentence in the PHB glossary about the Elemental Planes and a few passing references in spells/items/monster descriptions. I'm not asking for 3.5 levels of coverage (much less coverage on the level of <em>Manual of the Planes</em>, <em>Planescape</em> boxed set, or <em>The Inner Planes</em>), just a small nod to continuity and those of us that happen to like the Elemental Planes. (I'd like a sentence each for Quasi- and Para- Elemental Planes, too, but I'll let that sleeping dog lie.)</p><p></p><p>If they then wanted to spend a bunch of detail on (a) new, <em>additional</em> plane(s) at the same time, inhabited by elementals and genies or whatever? Hey, go right ahead! Just leave the one sentence mention of the Elemental Planes, and all my objections melt away. Or if they just want to spruce up the existing Elemental Planes, again, I have no objection.</p><p></p><p>But, once again, that's <em>not</em> what they're doing, according to the blog post I quoted. They are taking out the Elemental Planes and putting in an alternative. Maybe he miswrote, and we'll find out the Elemental Planes are still in. I'd sure like that to be the case. I'm not betting heavily on that.</p><p></p><p>I see some have taken me to task for suggesting the only reason to not include even a single sentence to retain cosmological continuity was that the designers wanted change for change's sake, saying the reasons presented in the blog post explained the situation just fine. Well, if the PHB and DMG are both so tightly written that there's no way to slip in <em>Elemental Plane: One of the Inner Planes consisting entirely of one type of matter: Air, Earth, Fire, or Water</em> without eliminating something "interesting", I'll admit I was too quick to accuse the change of being merely for the sake of change. Presumably, if the PHB and DMG turn out not to be so tightly written, they will admit I was correct and that the explanations given in the post do not explain the elimination of the Elemental Planes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="see, post: 3788810, member: 10531"] I would be perfectly fine with that. All the reference to them in the three AD&D 1e core books was being named in the PHB, showing up on the PHB's planar diagram, and a couple passing mentions in spell/magic item/monster descriptions. The original 3e core books had a sentence in the PHB glossary about the Elemental Planes and a few passing references in spells/items/monster descriptions. I'm not asking for 3.5 levels of coverage (much less coverage on the level of [I]Manual of the Planes[/I], [I]Planescape[/I] boxed set, or [I]The Inner Planes[/I]), just a small nod to continuity and those of us that happen to like the Elemental Planes. (I'd like a sentence each for Quasi- and Para- Elemental Planes, too, but I'll let that sleeping dog lie.) If they then wanted to spend a bunch of detail on (a) new, [i]additional[/i] plane(s) at the same time, inhabited by elementals and genies or whatever? Hey, go right ahead! Just leave the one sentence mention of the Elemental Planes, and all my objections melt away. Or if they just want to spruce up the existing Elemental Planes, again, I have no objection. But, once again, that's [i]not[/i] what they're doing, according to the blog post I quoted. They are taking out the Elemental Planes and putting in an alternative. Maybe he miswrote, and we'll find out the Elemental Planes are still in. I'd sure like that to be the case. I'm not betting heavily on that. I see some have taken me to task for suggesting the only reason to not include even a single sentence to retain cosmological continuity was that the designers wanted change for change's sake, saying the reasons presented in the blog post explained the situation just fine. Well, if the PHB and DMG are both so tightly written that there's no way to slip in [I]Elemental Plane: One of the Inner Planes consisting entirely of one type of matter: Air, Earth, Fire, or Water[/I] without eliminating something "interesting", I'll admit I was too quick to accuse the change of being merely for the sake of change. Presumably, if the PHB and DMG turn out not to be so tightly written, they will admit I was correct and that the explanations given in the post do not explain the elimination of the Elemental Planes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Elemental Planes Killed
Top