Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Elemental Planes Killed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="broghammerj" data-source="post: 3793292" data-attributes="member: 1869"><p><span style="color: DarkRed">"The D&D cosmology — largely unchanged since 1st Edition — is receiving its share of scrutiny as well. We're making revisions to the cosmology so that the planes work better as adventure sites. Case in point, the individual Elemental Planes (as decribed in 2E and 3E) aren't the most interesting adventure locations; their sheer inhospitability, vastness, and uniformity discourages exploration, and the creatures that dwell there are predictable and easy to thwart if you're packing the right spells. (Of course, these planes don't hold a candle to 2E's hilarious Plane of Vacuum, which is truly the antithesis of fun.) In the Wizards Presents: Worlds and Monsters book, we'll present in more detail 4th Edition's alternative to the Elemental Planes of Water, Fire, Earth, and Air. My hope is that the cosmological changes will excite players and actually encourage DMs to set adventures in these far-flung locales."</span></p><p></p><p>I find some very bad logic in this quote. The planes are inhospitable and discourage exploration, yet the creatures are predictable and easy to thwart. To me this doesn't make much sense. I believe we call this home field advantage. It's the same way you take a penalty turning undead in an defiled area. Call me crazy, but I don't expect my ray of frost to work well in a plane of fire.</p><p></p><p>I also wave the BS flag. First of all you need to be pretty high level to get to the outer planes (I exclude Planescape which is a specific campaign world). We know the current sweet spot of DND is not typically past 12th level and many groups quit playing after this. Therefore I would argue most groups or players have not even had the opportunity to travel to the elemental planes. I would argue that most people posting haven't even attempted to adventure in them. I also realize that this does not prevent you from wanting them changed in an upcoming edition.</p><p></p><p>To me the planes should be alien, inhospitable, and elementals in their home world should be near indestructible. The reason is that when these creatures travel to the prime material plane, they should be feared. In my world and most DND players' world, mortals don't mix with the Gods. I certainly don't want my low level or mid level players adventuring there.</p><p></p><p>The planes should be a paragraph in the core rules. The should remain much as they have been in previous editions. Those that do run campaigns at high levels and want to send PCs to the elemental planes can generate the worlds in whatever fashion they like.</p><p></p><p>It bothers me that this is something the designers are even concerned with. I have never sat around and had a conversation with any of my four previous game groups over 20+ years and said that the planes need to be altered. There are so many other improvements to be made or detailed. I don't think the DND community is clamoring for this as there hasn't been a big outcry in the past.</p><p></p><p>DND is like a house built on a foundation. You call them sacred cows if you will. Start knocking down too many struts and the house collapses. When it's rebuilt, it may not be the place you used to call home.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="broghammerj, post: 3793292, member: 1869"] [COLOR=DarkRed]"The D&D cosmology — largely unchanged since 1st Edition — is receiving its share of scrutiny as well. We're making revisions to the cosmology so that the planes work better as adventure sites. Case in point, the individual Elemental Planes (as decribed in 2E and 3E) aren't the most interesting adventure locations; their sheer inhospitability, vastness, and uniformity discourages exploration, and the creatures that dwell there are predictable and easy to thwart if you're packing the right spells. (Of course, these planes don't hold a candle to 2E's hilarious Plane of Vacuum, which is truly the antithesis of fun.) In the Wizards Presents: Worlds and Monsters book, we'll present in more detail 4th Edition's alternative to the Elemental Planes of Water, Fire, Earth, and Air. My hope is that the cosmological changes will excite players and actually encourage DMs to set adventures in these far-flung locales."[/COLOR] I find some very bad logic in this quote. The planes are inhospitable and discourage exploration, yet the creatures are predictable and easy to thwart. To me this doesn't make much sense. I believe we call this home field advantage. It's the same way you take a penalty turning undead in an defiled area. Call me crazy, but I don't expect my ray of frost to work well in a plane of fire. I also wave the BS flag. First of all you need to be pretty high level to get to the outer planes (I exclude Planescape which is a specific campaign world). We know the current sweet spot of DND is not typically past 12th level and many groups quit playing after this. Therefore I would argue most groups or players have not even had the opportunity to travel to the elemental planes. I would argue that most people posting haven't even attempted to adventure in them. I also realize that this does not prevent you from wanting them changed in an upcoming edition. To me the planes should be alien, inhospitable, and elementals in their home world should be near indestructible. The reason is that when these creatures travel to the prime material plane, they should be feared. In my world and most DND players' world, mortals don't mix with the Gods. I certainly don't want my low level or mid level players adventuring there. The planes should be a paragraph in the core rules. The should remain much as they have been in previous editions. Those that do run campaigns at high levels and want to send PCs to the elemental planes can generate the worlds in whatever fashion they like. It bothers me that this is something the designers are even concerned with. I have never sat around and had a conversation with any of my four previous game groups over 20+ years and said that the planes need to be altered. There are so many other improvements to be made or detailed. I don't think the DND community is clamoring for this as there hasn't been a big outcry in the past. DND is like a house built on a foundation. You call them sacred cows if you will. Start knocking down too many struts and the house collapses. When it's rebuilt, it may not be the place you used to call home. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Elemental Planes Killed
Top