Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Elements of Magic revised Mage and Wizard!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RandomUsernamehmimo71" data-source="post: 1645637" data-attributes="member: 9051"><p>That's what I love about this design. It's clever.. And it looks great in a visual story mode.</p><p></p><p>What bugs me, though, is that they still don't feel entirely balanced, and I think you might be right about the sublte effect..</p><p>The problem, as I see it, is it's trying to emulate the 2nd edition psionics style of casting, where you just concentrate, and don't necessarily have a visual effect of the casting.. That's great and all, but forcing wizards to have one is a big minus for them.</p><p></p><p>That's why I think Wizards needs something that makes up for it.. If you were going to keep Mages having Silent and stilled spells, (bigger than two feats), then the Wizard needs something Specific, something that's special for them.</p><p>Scribe scroll should certainly be free for them, since their entire class depends on it.</p><p>But for a wizard specific effect, I'm at a loss.. </p><p>Something about letting them "read magic" on scrolls for free? Ideas?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I understand where you're going with this, but I don't like it.. I still think both Mages and Wizards should cast spells, and both should be ABLE to learn new spells from a book, but that Wizards can cast out of a book in combat, and can memorize (prepare) spells that aren't from their spell-lists... Assuming they are in the book.</p><p></p><p>I think it's a great balance as it is.. Mages are good at flexibility, and can create new spells in combat, at half MP.</p><p>Wizards are spell-masters, and can learn any spell, even if it's not in a Spell-list..</p><p></p><p>Realisitically, thinking about the two, the main difference is that to cast non spell-list spells, there are two approaches-</p><p>The wizard has to use a memorized spell, from a book</p><p>where the mage has to use only half her total MP.</p><p></p><p>Both work well, and both balance, at least on the surface.. The problem comes in that when casting spell-list spells, the mage has a big bonus..</p><p>They can cast non signature spells, and the wizard can't.. I don't see what the wizard gets in return here. </p><p>Granted, above, they have a balance, but here, the mage seems ahead..</p><p></p><p>Kemrain, could you help to explain why I'm wrong?</p><p></p><p>The Cantrips = Spells / day is brilliant, and I love it very much. Then again, I've suggested it before as well <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>-Colin</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RandomUsernamehmimo71, post: 1645637, member: 9051"] That's what I love about this design. It's clever.. And it looks great in a visual story mode. What bugs me, though, is that they still don't feel entirely balanced, and I think you might be right about the sublte effect.. The problem, as I see it, is it's trying to emulate the 2nd edition psionics style of casting, where you just concentrate, and don't necessarily have a visual effect of the casting.. That's great and all, but forcing wizards to have one is a big minus for them. That's why I think Wizards needs something that makes up for it.. If you were going to keep Mages having Silent and stilled spells, (bigger than two feats), then the Wizard needs something Specific, something that's special for them. Scribe scroll should certainly be free for them, since their entire class depends on it. But for a wizard specific effect, I'm at a loss.. Something about letting them "read magic" on scrolls for free? Ideas? I understand where you're going with this, but I don't like it.. I still think both Mages and Wizards should cast spells, and both should be ABLE to learn new spells from a book, but that Wizards can cast out of a book in combat, and can memorize (prepare) spells that aren't from their spell-lists... Assuming they are in the book. I think it's a great balance as it is.. Mages are good at flexibility, and can create new spells in combat, at half MP. Wizards are spell-masters, and can learn any spell, even if it's not in a Spell-list.. Realisitically, thinking about the two, the main difference is that to cast non spell-list spells, there are two approaches- The wizard has to use a memorized spell, from a book where the mage has to use only half her total MP. Both work well, and both balance, at least on the surface.. The problem comes in that when casting spell-list spells, the mage has a big bonus.. They can cast non signature spells, and the wizard can't.. I don't see what the wizard gets in return here. Granted, above, they have a balance, but here, the mage seems ahead.. Kemrain, could you help to explain why I'm wrong? The Cantrips = Spells / day is brilliant, and I love it very much. Then again, I've suggested it before as well ;) -Colin [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Elements of Magic revised Mage and Wizard!
Top