Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Archus" data-source="post: 1838755" data-attributes="member: 25334">When put in light of having a range of 5 ft it may not bother me much - or I'm just going with my final option of quitting my whining.  While you can't get cantrips that have a real range and have to spend more than I think is justified for range - you can do things that you can't in normal d20 (short range teleport or turning into a bird/fish for 1 MP for example).  Overall EoMR makes much more sense.I was considering allowing people to spend more MP than their caster level for general enhancements - hence overspending for range.  Maybe I'll add a feat "Overcasting" that lets you spend 1 or 2 MP over you caster level limit for General enhancements only or "General Enhancment Specalist" that reduces the cost of General Enhancements by 1 or 2 MP.I've grown accustom to fireball like damage, but this is just whining.  Sure I can't dish out 10d6 fireballs at 10th level, but I can do a whole bunch more stuff as an EoMR spellcaster.  Also my biggest complaints about D&D evaporate using EoMR:* Multiclassing spellcasters are screwed.  EoMR makes caster levels stack like base attack does for fighters.* Clerics are a hideously overpowered class - better armor, weapons, hit points, special domain powers and about the same massive damage potential as wizards.  EoMR puts all spellcasters on a level playing field.I'm eagerly awaiting the Lyceian Arcana to start a game.</blockquote>

Verification