Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mannahnin" data-source="post: 9455611" data-attributes="member: 7026594">Eh. I think we've got some unshared assumptions.I think we'd need significantly more data to conclude that there's &quot;no way&quot;.&nbsp; Are you assuming that because they're both on the general price list, that in any given area both are always by default available to buy and competing against each other?&nbsp; I'm not sure I'd assume that. Did 5E entirely ditch the rules that non-warhorses either won't willingly participate in combat (those stats are for when they're forced to fight, ie: like being attacked by wolves when they're stuck in a pen or on a tether), or have to take a morale test every single round or bolt?&nbsp; That used to be one of the substantial advantages of a warhorse.If so, than your analysis of the pricing from a pure game stats perspective may be on target, and maybe the pricing is a legacy holdover in part from when the game had more rules that have since gone missing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mannahnin, post: 9455611, member: 7026594"] Eh. I think we've got some unshared assumptions. I think we'd need significantly more data to conclude that there's "no way". Are you assuming that because they're both on the general price list, that in any given area both are always by default available to buy and competing against each other? I'm not sure I'd assume that. Did 5E entirely ditch the rules that non-warhorses either won't willingly participate in combat (those stats are for when they're forced to fight, ie: like being attacked by wolves when they're stuck in a pen or on a tether), or have to take a morale test every single round or bolt? That used to be one of the substantial advantages of a warhorse. If so, than your analysis of the pricing from a pure game stats perspective may be on target, and maybe the pricing is a legacy holdover in part from when the game had more rules that have since gone missing. [/QUOTE]

Verification