Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Elucidating Alignment - Part I: Law and Chaos
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Archon of Light" data-source="post: 3694216" data-attributes="member: 20967"><p>Having authored something like this years ago, I was intrigued when I read the title of the thread. I'm always interested in reading someone else's take on the alignment debate, especially when it is well-written. I found this post was not only that, but also well-organized and presented intelligently. The format itself showed a great amount of effort and care, which I can certainly appreciate. The information was more than adequately thought out and provided some interesting insights. But for all your efforts, I feel that this particular essay has missed the intended mark.</p><p></p><p>It is not enough to simply describe one end of the spectrum (Lawful) so thoroughly and then sum up the other ends (Neutral and Chaotic) so quickly. To me, this suggests that each one of these aspects is either a different degree, or a lack thereof the primary you have chosen, which in this case is the Lawful aspect. The Neutral and Chaotic aspects are much more complex than you give indication of, and certainly deserve at least the same amount of attention.</p><p></p><p>More specifically, however, your interpretation of the Lawful alignment is askewed. Being Lawful is not about following the rules or principles. It is about a personal need for order and structure. You've managed to describe one degree of such behavior very well, but it is just one degree of it. On a personal level, Lawful people are creatures of habit. They create routines for themselves even when there are no external influences that require them to do so. Some eat their meals at roughly the same time everyday and feel uncomfortable or uneasy when they are forced to eat at a later time, for example. </p><p></p><p>Being Lawful has little to do with actual laws; it's more about being in control, or even being controlled. In general, most orderly people tend to be organized, cautious, and thoughtful. They like to plan ahead, explore all their options, and keep prepared by anticipating everything. They are not typically fond of surprises and usually avoid taking any unnecessary or uncalculated risks. They value such things as honor, tradition, logic, security, and discipline, because all of these promote a controlled environment.</p><p></p><p>There's certainly more to it that can be elaborated, but I'll leave it at that so I don't hijack the thread. I strongly suggest if you're going to continue to at least give Chaotic and Neutral the same amount of attention and not to simply represent them as varying levels of Lawful.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Archon of Light, post: 3694216, member: 20967"] Having authored something like this years ago, I was intrigued when I read the title of the thread. I'm always interested in reading someone else's take on the alignment debate, especially when it is well-written. I found this post was not only that, but also well-organized and presented intelligently. The format itself showed a great amount of effort and care, which I can certainly appreciate. The information was more than adequately thought out and provided some interesting insights. But for all your efforts, I feel that this particular essay has missed the intended mark. It is not enough to simply describe one end of the spectrum (Lawful) so thoroughly and then sum up the other ends (Neutral and Chaotic) so quickly. To me, this suggests that each one of these aspects is either a different degree, or a lack thereof the primary you have chosen, which in this case is the Lawful aspect. The Neutral and Chaotic aspects are much more complex than you give indication of, and certainly deserve at least the same amount of attention. More specifically, however, your interpretation of the Lawful alignment is askewed. Being Lawful is not about following the rules or principles. It is about a personal need for order and structure. You've managed to describe one degree of such behavior very well, but it is just one degree of it. On a personal level, Lawful people are creatures of habit. They create routines for themselves even when there are no external influences that require them to do so. Some eat their meals at roughly the same time everyday and feel uncomfortable or uneasy when they are forced to eat at a later time, for example. Being Lawful has little to do with actual laws; it's more about being in control, or even being controlled. In general, most orderly people tend to be organized, cautious, and thoughtful. They like to plan ahead, explore all their options, and keep prepared by anticipating everything. They are not typically fond of surprises and usually avoid taking any unnecessary or uncalculated risks. They value such things as honor, tradition, logic, security, and discipline, because all of these promote a controlled environment. There's certainly more to it that can be elaborated, but I'll leave it at that so I don't hijack the thread. I strongly suggest if you're going to continue to at least give Chaotic and Neutral the same amount of attention and not to simply represent them as varying levels of Lawful. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Elucidating Alignment - Part I: Law and Chaos
Top