Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ARandomGod" data-source="post: 2785239" data-attributes="member: 17296">However, the above states that if I kiss my wife, I immediately get to pinch her butt. We're assuming that I'm abandoning my pinch action to take the kiss action, but if I got the kiss action from something else, perhaps byt provoking a tickle of opportunity, well, I'd still get that pinch from the kiss.I ... don't understand your point. I mean, I understand that you're attempting to say I'm using poor logic without supporting your point, yes.My point above wasn't logic, it was a question. I'm not sure why you thought my question used poor logic. But even a poorly thought out question is a question. However, I'll attempt some sort of response, based on "Just because WotC makes a clarification on a rule does not mean that the rule means something other than what it states."  I was not, in fact, attempting to say that WoTC making a rules clarification would make the rule mean something else. However I did ask where and how, because if it wasn't an errata, then it's not actually a rules clarification, it's some guy's interpretation... and therefore no more valid than yours, or mine. I also asked what exactly the clarification was, since they could be "clarifying" something in Knockdown that doesn't directly bear, or only bears tangentially, on Improved Trip -  elusive target.I did attempt to say that if an errata (or rules clarification) on a DIFFERENT rule that has similiar wording were needed, then a similiar errata on this rule would also be needed. Therefore the presence of an errata on rule B does not imply a similiar errata on rule A, however it very well might indicate that one "should" be made.</blockquote>

Verification