Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="catsclaw227" data-source="post: 4657078" data-attributes="member: 14197">First, no one is trying to make Ema out to be some super-pirate.  It has been clearly stated by Ema that they did the right thing.  It has also been shown that Ema's site charged for use of services and that these services included non-OGL 3.x information, as well as protected 4e IP, all without permission.  This is illegal, anyway you slice it.I don't think that it's about "all out war".  That is stretching it a bit.  But strict adherence to a policy?  This is important.  If WOTC knowingly allows Ema's site to provide protected content (while charging money), they set a precedence for other sites and companies to create a for-profit venture riding on that same IP.They are following a standard process of protecting IP.  How is this problematic for you?</blockquote>