Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Ema's RPG Sheet Website down...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="catsclaw227" data-source="post: 4657712" data-attributes="member: 14197"><p>I agree that the original 3.5 WOTC sheets were poorly done, but I know lots of people that used them without problem in lots of games. And they were able to enjoy the D&D game and knew their PC just fine. Just because we didn't like the layout doesn't mean they were unusable crap.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I export them to PDF just fine, and there's a thread out there that has many people discussing just how they do this. Should WOTC have made "export to pdf" native to the application? Maybe, but it's not really critical. One additional thing to note, with the CB you can send your DM the sheet as a *.dnd4e file and (s)he can load it into their copy of the CB as well. And if they don't have a DDI sub, and they are a DM, your group might wnat to consider buy it for them. It will save your poor hard-working DM a TON of time with adventure prep.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They weren't that harsh. A C&D is totally appropriate for what Ema was doing, and it appears that Ema and WOTC came to an agreement about what should be done. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, I think it bears repeating...</p><p></p><p>If WOTC knowingly allows Ema's site to provide protected content (while charging money), they set a precedence for other sites and companies to create a for-profit venture riding on that same IP. I am sure there is a technical term for this, but they really had no choice. Ema's site, especially because it was well liked by the fandom, put WOTC in a terribly compromising situation and they had to act in the way they did.</p><p></p><p>I can envision a conversation like this....</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">WOTC: I know a lot of people like your site and the fans use it for character sheets, but you KNOW you shouldn't have used all this non-OGL and 4e material.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Ema: Yea, but to make the sheets a valuable resource for the player, I needed to add it.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">WOTC: Yes, but it was illegal.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Ema: I know...... sorry.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">WOTC: You know you have to shut it down, right? I wish we didn't have to do this, because the fans like it, but if we don't someone else will do something worse and then we're screwed.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Ema: yea... I know.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">WOTC: As much as we don't like to, you know we have to send you an official C&D letter, right?</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Ema: yea... I know...</p><p></p><p>Just speculating and all....</p><p></p><p>EDIT: and who knew that the INDENT tag puts the text in scary MOD-SPEAK colors. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="catsclaw227, post: 4657712, member: 14197"] I agree that the original 3.5 WOTC sheets were poorly done, but I know lots of people that used them without problem in lots of games. And they were able to enjoy the D&D game and knew their PC just fine. Just because we didn't like the layout doesn't mean they were unusable crap. I export them to PDF just fine, and there's a thread out there that has many people discussing just how they do this. Should WOTC have made "export to pdf" native to the application? Maybe, but it's not really critical. One additional thing to note, with the CB you can send your DM the sheet as a *.dnd4e file and (s)he can load it into their copy of the CB as well. And if they don't have a DDI sub, and they are a DM, your group might wnat to consider buy it for them. It will save your poor hard-working DM a TON of time with adventure prep. They weren't that harsh. A C&D is totally appropriate for what Ema was doing, and it appears that Ema and WOTC came to an agreement about what should be done. Again, I think it bears repeating... If WOTC knowingly allows Ema's site to provide protected content (while charging money), they set a precedence for other sites and companies to create a for-profit venture riding on that same IP. I am sure there is a technical term for this, but they really had no choice. Ema's site, especially because it was well liked by the fandom, put WOTC in a terribly compromising situation and they had to act in the way they did. I can envision a conversation like this.... [INDENT]WOTC: I know a lot of people like your site and the fans use it for character sheets, but you KNOW you shouldn't have used all this non-OGL and 4e material. Ema: Yea, but to make the sheets a valuable resource for the player, I needed to add it. WOTC: Yes, but it was illegal. Ema: I know...... sorry. WOTC: You know you have to shut it down, right? I wish we didn't have to do this, because the fans like it, but if we don't someone else will do something worse and then we're screwed. Ema: yea... I know. WOTC: As much as we don't like to, you know we have to send you an official C&D letter, right? Ema: yea... I know...[/INDENT] Just speculating and all.... EDIT: and who knew that the INDENT tag puts the text in scary MOD-SPEAK colors. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Ema's RPG Sheet Website down...
Top