Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[EN Pub] The Fantastic Science -- 24-page teaser!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kelleris" data-source="post: 2808447" data-attributes="member: 19130"><p>A <em>furnace kindler</em> allows a Reflex save to half the damage it deals - the DC of that Reflex save is affected by the range to the target. Essentially, the device projects a 50-foot cone of fire (5 range increments; an unusually large area of effect, for what it's worth) and deals its damage in that area. Within 10 feet of the technologist, the save is at the normal DC, within 20 feet it's the normal DC minus 2, within 30 feet the normal DC minus 4, and so forth. The activation cost is and should be 5 points for a set-duration lesser gadget, so that's right. A 1st-level technologist can only use it once/day (without some bonus stabilization points from a high ability score) because he's first level (much the same reason a 1st-level wizard can only memorize a single <em>magic missile</em> spell). A technologist's free use of low-level devices doesn't kick in for a few more levels - compared to the psion (for instance) they have to pay for their higher BAB, HD, craft points, and vastly improved skill access somehow. They pay for those things by having very limited use of their best devices, and at first level, well, a <em>furnace kindler</em> <strong>is</strong> your best device. It doesn't nerf the technologist too badly, believe me, especially since you can also start with a backpack full of alchemist's fire by spending your craft points. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The <em>antimagic field</em> either has no effect at all on FS, or it blocks it (I recommend the latter, generally speaking). It definitely doesn't allow free use of devices within its area. The key is realizing that the <em>antimagic</em> part is in reference to its function, not its nature. The <em>field</em> is actually a sort of scrambling field - it makes working magic by spellcasting impossible, but it hardly gets rid of it. This was the tact I took for the technologist's equivalent of the <em>antimagic field</em>, the <em>inviolate shield</em>, and it's suggested by the ability of <em>Mordenkainen's disjunction</em> to negate an <em>antimagic field</em> (which wouldn't make sense if there isn't actually a spell in the area to disjon, after all).</p><p></p><p>Anyway, the upshot of all this is that there's still plenty of magic in an <em>antimagic field</em>, it's just that it's all too scrambled to function properly. I would say that makes it even harder (read: practically impossible) to activate a device, but it certainly shouldn't make life easier for the technologist. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Does that clear everything up? I feel like I should have had a sidebar on the matter next to the <em>inviolate shield against magic</em> entry. Oh well, not like it's anything new for <em>antimagic field</em> to cause wonky conceptual problems. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kelleris, post: 2808447, member: 19130"] A [i]furnace kindler[/i] allows a Reflex save to half the damage it deals - the DC of that Reflex save is affected by the range to the target. Essentially, the device projects a 50-foot cone of fire (5 range increments; an unusually large area of effect, for what it's worth) and deals its damage in that area. Within 10 feet of the technologist, the save is at the normal DC, within 20 feet it's the normal DC minus 2, within 30 feet the normal DC minus 4, and so forth. The activation cost is and should be 5 points for a set-duration lesser gadget, so that's right. A 1st-level technologist can only use it once/day (without some bonus stabilization points from a high ability score) because he's first level (much the same reason a 1st-level wizard can only memorize a single [i]magic missile[/i] spell). A technologist's free use of low-level devices doesn't kick in for a few more levels - compared to the psion (for instance) they have to pay for their higher BAB, HD, craft points, and vastly improved skill access somehow. They pay for those things by having very limited use of their best devices, and at first level, well, a [i]furnace kindler[/i] [b]is[/b] your best device. It doesn't nerf the technologist too badly, believe me, especially since you can also start with a backpack full of alchemist's fire by spending your craft points. :D The [I]antimagic field[/I] either has no effect at all on FS, or it blocks it (I recommend the latter, generally speaking). It definitely doesn't allow free use of devices within its area. The key is realizing that the [i]antimagic[/i] part is in reference to its function, not its nature. The [I]field[/I] is actually a sort of scrambling field - it makes working magic by spellcasting impossible, but it hardly gets rid of it. This was the tact I took for the technologist's equivalent of the [i]antimagic field[/i], the [I]inviolate shield[/I], and it's suggested by the ability of [i]Mordenkainen's disjunction[/i] to negate an [i]antimagic field[/i] (which wouldn't make sense if there isn't actually a spell in the area to disjon, after all). Anyway, the upshot of all this is that there's still plenty of magic in an [I]antimagic field[/I], it's just that it's all too scrambled to function properly. I would say that makes it even harder (read: practically impossible) to activate a device, but it certainly shouldn't make life easier for the technologist. :) Does that clear everything up? I feel like I should have had a sidebar on the matter next to the [I]inviolate shield against magic[/I] entry. Oh well, not like it's anything new for [i]antimagic field[/i] to cause wonky conceptual problems. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[EN Pub] The Fantastic Science -- 24-page teaser!
Top