Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
EN World World Cup blog
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jdvn1" data-source="post: 2921842" data-attributes="member: 26424"><p>I'd just like to mention that Brazil has drawn against Bolivia and Japan in the past year. Not exactly stellar teams, to say the least.</p><p>... And I'd like to mention that Czech Republic (ranked 2 in the world, I'm sure you remember) suffered embarrassing loses, not making it to the second round (though, the US team this year might be a better comparison).</p><p></p><p>My point is that good teams don't always play well. They just have a <em>tendency</em> to play well. Which brings us to Spain</p><p>Which is a very good point, I'd like to say. In my opinion, the most relevant point. Spain was a very good team, that was also playing very well. "In form" as some soccer people say, and it's certainly true. Basketball fans (and in other sports) might call this a "streak." A streak is typically when you win a number of games in a row and is characterized by very good or better-than-average play.</p><p></p><p>And, Spain was certainly playing very well. I, personally, put less stock in this than most. Maybe I should pay attention to it more, but I'm not a big fan of streaks. You never know when they're going to start and you never know when they're going to end. "Easy come, easy go." After all, if "being in form" was so easy to attain and hold on to, why wouldn't all the best teams always be in form? There's a definite randomness to it, and I never rely on it.</p><p></p><p>So, while I agree Spain was playing very well, and had they kept it up (and France had continued playing at the level they were), Spain could have easily won the game.</p><p></p><p>But, I think France's "average quality" is better than Spain's "average quality" and if soccer pundits don't agree with me, well FIFA rankings usually do. There are a lot of weird soccer pundits that say a lot of weird things for weird reasons anyway. Maybe it's because all the ones in the US suck, but you have to take what they say with many grains of salt.</p><p></p><p>Sorry for the rant, I just think that's where we differ the most in opinion so I figured I'd put my piece out there and let it go... because, well, it's kind of a moot point now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jdvn1, post: 2921842, member: 26424"] I'd just like to mention that Brazil has drawn against Bolivia and Japan in the past year. Not exactly stellar teams, to say the least. ... And I'd like to mention that Czech Republic (ranked 2 in the world, I'm sure you remember) suffered embarrassing loses, not making it to the second round (though, the US team this year might be a better comparison). My point is that good teams don't always play well. They just have a [i]tendency[/i] to play well. Which brings us to Spain Which is a very good point, I'd like to say. In my opinion, the most relevant point. Spain was a very good team, that was also playing very well. "In form" as some soccer people say, and it's certainly true. Basketball fans (and in other sports) might call this a "streak." A streak is typically when you win a number of games in a row and is characterized by very good or better-than-average play. And, Spain was certainly playing very well. I, personally, put less stock in this than most. Maybe I should pay attention to it more, but I'm not a big fan of streaks. You never know when they're going to start and you never know when they're going to end. "Easy come, easy go." After all, if "being in form" was so easy to attain and hold on to, why wouldn't all the best teams always be in form? There's a definite randomness to it, and I never rely on it. So, while I agree Spain was playing very well, and had they kept it up (and France had continued playing at the level they were), Spain could have easily won the game. But, I think France's "average quality" is better than Spain's "average quality" and if soccer pundits don't agree with me, well FIFA rankings usually do. There are a lot of weird soccer pundits that say a lot of weird things for weird reasons anyway. Maybe it's because all the ones in the US suck, but you have to take what they say with many grains of salt. Sorry for the rant, I just think that's where we differ the most in opinion so I figured I'd put my piece out there and let it go... because, well, it's kind of a moot point now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
EN World World Cup blog
Top