Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Enchantment, Compulsion, "Ongoing control"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jimlock" data-source="post: 5695074" data-attributes="member: 6674931"><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Not fair again. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>You accused me, of using "mindless" differently without explaining myself, only AFTER I had ALREADY explained myself.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>But let's stick to the core of the debate shall we?</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>You are missing something important here, but let me explain.</em></p><p><em>Don't curse, swear or anything of the sort until you've read all of the following <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> :</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>ALL undead are IMMUNE to MIND-AFFECTING effects. </em></p><p><em>No matter how one interprets mind/brain/intelligence <em>(be that my interpretation that undead are mindless in a sense that they have no mind/brain and that their intelligence and very existence stems from a supernatural unliving force... or yours... or any other interpretation)</em> the fact remains that they are IMMUNE to MIND-AFFECTING effects, and having YOUR mind controlled is undoubtedly one such effect.</em></p><p><em>So no one, no matter what, has the ability to control/affect the mind/brain/intelligence of the undead.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><span style="color: Olive">Immunity to all mind-affecting effects (charms, compulsions, phantasms, patterns, and morale effects)</span></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>So then, what do these phrases actually say?</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><span style="color: Olive">A commanded undead creature <span style="color: lime"><strong>is under the</strong></span> mental control of the evil cleric. The cleric must take a standard action <span style="color: Lime"><strong>to give mental orders</strong></span> to a commanded undead. </span></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Well these two phrases say the following:</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>They say that the cleric commands/controls the unlving force of the undead using HIS mind, not that he controls the mind of the undead. The cleric does not speak the commands he gives the undead, he thinks of them (therefore: <u>under the</u> mental control of... + give mental orders) Mental control is used in a totally different context here.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Mental control has two meanings: </em></p><p><em><strong><u>a)</u></strong>Either YOUR mind is being controlled by something/someone, or </em></p><p><em><strong><u>b)</u></strong>YOU control something/someone with your mind.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>In the case of commanding undead it is obviously the latter <strong><u>(b)</u></strong>. The cleric gives mental orders so as to <u>command</u> the undead. And again, let's not forget that undead are IMMUNE to mind affecting effects, and that mind/mental control would have been such an effect the undead would have been immune to.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>The cleric commands/controls the unliving force that makes the undead an undead, he does not have the control of a mind.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>On the other hand, PFE and Disobedience use "mental control" the other way around. They both say:</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><span style="color: Olive">blocks any attempt to exercise mental control over the subject creature</span></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>This time mental control is used as in <strong><u>(a)</u></strong>. The spells, protect YOUR mind from being controlled by somebody else, no matter how the controller controls YOUR mind (be that with verbal orders or mental orders). Not that the phrase is unclear in that respect, but the enchantment examples that follow that phrase make it even clearer:</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><span style="color: olive">including enchantment (charm) effects and enchantment (compulsion) effects that grant the caster ongoing control over the subject</span></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>because enchantment says the following:</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><span style="color: olive">Enchantment spells affect the minds of others, influencing or controlling their behavior.</span></em></p><p><em><span style="color: olive"></span></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>So again, command undead (be that by the spell or by rebuking) or any other command spell cannot be blocked by PFE and Disobedience.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Check out what exactly?</em></p><p><em>permits multiple commands over the duration?</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><span style="color: Olive">This spell functions like command, except that up to one creature per level may be affected, and the activities continue beyond 1 round. At the start of each commanded creature’s action after the first, it gets another Will save to attempt to break free from the spell. Each creature must receive the same command.</span></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>In respect to "ongoing control" nothing changes from "Command" to Greater "Command"</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><span style="color: Olive">You give the subject <span style="color: Lime"><strong>a single command.</strong></span></span></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>This is not ongoing control.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>You are confusing "multiple commands" (as in multiple targets, which is what the spell says and which is irrelevant: <span style="color: Olive">except that up to one creature per level may be affected</span>) with "multiple commands" (as in more than one command, which is not what the spell says).</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>I'm not getting this anywhere. I keep it where i first put it since my first posts:</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>That it still remains awkward how after the <span style="color: olive">including</span> and the <span style="color: olive">such as</span></em></p><p><em>the only mental controls they block are the examples after the <span style="color: olive">including</span> (?), and that all Enchantment-Compulsions with "ongoing-control" is the Dominate effect, which is given again as a single example out of the more implied.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>I guess it's badly written, but I cannot be sure.</em></p><p><em>If this was indeed their intention, why didn't they just say: "It blocks all Enchantment-charms and the Dominate spell/effect"? </em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Perhaps it is so, but that wouldn't be neither Command/Rebuke Undead, nor any other Command spell or effect.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jimlock, post: 5695074, member: 6674931"] [I] Not fair again. :) You accused me, of using "mindless" differently without explaining myself, only AFTER I had ALREADY explained myself. But let's stick to the core of the debate shall we? You are missing something important here, but let me explain. Don't curse, swear or anything of the sort until you've read all of the following :) : ALL undead are IMMUNE to MIND-AFFECTING effects. No matter how one interprets mind/brain/intelligence [I](be that my interpretation that undead are mindless in a sense that they have no mind/brain and that their intelligence and very existence stems from a supernatural unliving force... or yours... or any other interpretation)[/I] the fact remains that they are IMMUNE to MIND-AFFECTING effects, and having YOUR mind controlled is undoubtedly one such effect. So no one, no matter what, has the ability to control/affect the mind/brain/intelligence of the undead. [COLOR="Olive"]Immunity to all mind-affecting effects (charms, compulsions, phantasms, patterns, and morale effects)[/COLOR] So then, what do these phrases actually say? [COLOR="Olive"]A commanded undead creature [COLOR="lime"][B]is under the[/B][/COLOR] mental control of the evil cleric. The cleric must take a standard action [COLOR="Lime"][B]to give mental orders[/B][/COLOR] to a commanded undead. [/COLOR] Well these two phrases say the following: They say that the cleric commands/controls the unlving force of the undead using HIS mind, not that he controls the mind of the undead. The cleric does not speak the commands he gives the undead, he thinks of them (therefore: [U]under the[/U] mental control of... + give mental orders) Mental control is used in a totally different context here. Mental control has two meanings: [B][U]a)[/U][/B]Either YOUR mind is being controlled by something/someone, or [B][U]b)[/U][/B]YOU control something/someone with your mind. In the case of commanding undead it is obviously the latter [B][U](b)[/U][/B]. The cleric gives mental orders so as to [U]command[/U] the undead. And again, let's not forget that undead are IMMUNE to mind affecting effects, and that mind/mental control would have been such an effect the undead would have been immune to. The cleric commands/controls the unliving force that makes the undead an undead, he does not have the control of a mind. On the other hand, PFE and Disobedience use "mental control" the other way around. They both say: [COLOR="Olive"]blocks any attempt to exercise mental control over the subject creature[/COLOR] This time mental control is used as in [B][U](a)[/U][/B]. The spells, protect YOUR mind from being controlled by somebody else, no matter how the controller controls YOUR mind (be that with verbal orders or mental orders). Not that the phrase is unclear in that respect, but the enchantment examples that follow that phrase make it even clearer: [COLOR="olive"]including enchantment (charm) effects and enchantment (compulsion) effects that grant the caster ongoing control over the subject[/COLOR] because enchantment says the following: [COLOR="olive"]Enchantment spells affect the minds of others, influencing or controlling their behavior. [/COLOR] So again, command undead (be that by the spell or by rebuking) or any other command spell cannot be blocked by PFE and Disobedience. Check out what exactly? permits multiple commands over the duration? [COLOR="Olive"]This spell functions like command, except that up to one creature per level may be affected, and the activities continue beyond 1 round. At the start of each commanded creature’s action after the first, it gets another Will save to attempt to break free from the spell. Each creature must receive the same command.[/COLOR] In respect to "ongoing control" nothing changes from "Command" to Greater "Command" [COLOR="Olive"]You give the subject [COLOR="Lime"][B]a single command.[/B][/COLOR][/COLOR] This is not ongoing control. You are confusing "multiple commands" (as in multiple targets, which is what the spell says and which is irrelevant: [COLOR="Olive"]except that up to one creature per level may be affected[/COLOR]) with "multiple commands" (as in more than one command, which is not what the spell says). I'm not getting this anywhere. I keep it where i first put it since my first posts: That it still remains awkward how after the [COLOR="olive"]including[/COLOR] and the [COLOR="olive"]such as[/COLOR] the only mental controls they block are the examples after the [COLOR="olive"]including[/COLOR] (?), and that all Enchantment-Compulsions with "ongoing-control" is the Dominate effect, which is given again as a single example out of the more implied. I guess it's badly written, but I cannot be sure. If this was indeed their intention, why didn't they just say: "It blocks all Enchantment-charms and the Dominate spell/effect"? Perhaps it is so, but that wouldn't be neither Command/Rebuke Undead, nor any other Command spell or effect.[/i] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Enchantment, Compulsion, "Ongoing control"
Top