Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Encounter Building math: or I killed 2 PCs last night.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tormyr" data-source="post: 6385568" data-attributes="member: 6776887"><p>Huh, I just don't see the encounter building guidelines that negatively. For one thing, as many have pointed out, they are just guidelines. With how many creatures there are bound to be some interesting examples of how creatures can work together, but I think that changing a creatures XP based on who it was fighting with might get unwieldy quickly.</p><p></p><p>However, I would argue that the difficulty of an encounter almost always scales up faster than linearly based on how many creatures you add regardless of which creatures are used. Enough kobolds for a moderate encounter for a higher level party will quickly get out of hand for the party. There will be so many that even a few fireballs will not take them all down, and with pack tactics, there will be plenty of 20s rolled.</p><p></p><p>As for the intellect devourer example with 10-20 creatures, it would be difficult for that group to surprise anyone. Either some of them roll low on their stealth check or someone has a ridiculous passive perception. Our rogue/monk has a passive perception of 19 at level 5. The party should realize that 15 creatures need more than a run in with guns blazing strategy. The intellect devourers (those that survive the wizard's alpha strike) need to get someone to fail a DC12 and roll average or higher on its 3d6 intelligence attack. At this point, the cleric probably has greater restoration, and the wizard can keep slinging fireballs or setting up walls of fire in choke points while the fighters use their multiple attacks to hit the low AC low HP enemies from afar.</p><p></p><p>Even for a level 20 party of 4, a group of 15 CR2 creatures (27000XP) is beyond a moderate (22800) encounter, and it only takes 1 intellect devourer to be successful to set up the next for a body swap, but at level 20 where this scenario starts to make senes, the wizard had better have Wish prepared, or the cleric has True Resurrection prepared. Any group of 15 CR2 creatures is something worth running away from or at least having a decent strategy before engaging. Even 15 ogres, with their higher to hit modifier, damage and hp could be a real threat.</p><p></p><p>While the guidelines are not perfect, they have gone through play testing and are useful as guidelines. In some of these more extreme encounters, a playtest using copies of your character's sheets before the game might be worth running. That way, you know if the encounter will be too deadly. From all of my experience so far, the guidelines give a good indication of the difficulty of an encounter and how many of the party will be face down on the floor.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tormyr, post: 6385568, member: 6776887"] Huh, I just don't see the encounter building guidelines that negatively. For one thing, as many have pointed out, they are just guidelines. With how many creatures there are bound to be some interesting examples of how creatures can work together, but I think that changing a creatures XP based on who it was fighting with might get unwieldy quickly. However, I would argue that the difficulty of an encounter almost always scales up faster than linearly based on how many creatures you add regardless of which creatures are used. Enough kobolds for a moderate encounter for a higher level party will quickly get out of hand for the party. There will be so many that even a few fireballs will not take them all down, and with pack tactics, there will be plenty of 20s rolled. As for the intellect devourer example with 10-20 creatures, it would be difficult for that group to surprise anyone. Either some of them roll low on their stealth check or someone has a ridiculous passive perception. Our rogue/monk has a passive perception of 19 at level 5. The party should realize that 15 creatures need more than a run in with guns blazing strategy. The intellect devourers (those that survive the wizard's alpha strike) need to get someone to fail a DC12 and roll average or higher on its 3d6 intelligence attack. At this point, the cleric probably has greater restoration, and the wizard can keep slinging fireballs or setting up walls of fire in choke points while the fighters use their multiple attacks to hit the low AC low HP enemies from afar. Even for a level 20 party of 4, a group of 15 CR2 creatures (27000XP) is beyond a moderate (22800) encounter, and it only takes 1 intellect devourer to be successful to set up the next for a body swap, but at level 20 where this scenario starts to make senes, the wizard had better have Wish prepared, or the cleric has True Resurrection prepared. Any group of 15 CR2 creatures is something worth running away from or at least having a decent strategy before engaging. Even 15 ogres, with their higher to hit modifier, damage and hp could be a real threat. While the guidelines are not perfect, they have gone through play testing and are useful as guidelines. In some of these more extreme encounters, a playtest using copies of your character's sheets before the game might be worth running. That way, you know if the encounter will be too deadly. From all of my experience so far, the guidelines give a good indication of the difficulty of an encounter and how many of the party will be face down on the floor. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Encounter Building math: or I killed 2 PCs last night.
Top