Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dave2008" data-source="post: 6994756" data-attributes="member: 83242">OK - I'm ready to give this a shot!I agree, that is why, as noted in an earlier post, that the revised guidelines would be explicit and say this table is designed for a party of 4 composed of 1 fighter, 1 cleric, 1 rogue, and 1 wizard using the basic rules.&nbsp; And then I would have to develop suggestions / guidelines for different sized parties and parties of a different composition.I've thought about it.&nbsp; 1 table with descriptions on how to modify, or multiple tables with a different set of assumptions.&nbsp; I haven't decided yet, but I was leaning toward one table.&nbsp; I'm starting to rethink that approach.&nbsp;But if we make different tables for a different base assumptions, wouldn't the modifiers still apply?I think the revised table does exactly that, but it might be more noticeable at 5th level (fireball).I intend to. Could work, to me that seems like 6 in one, a half dozen in the other.Yes, ideally that is the type of analysis that should be done.&nbsp; I just don't know that I have the time or knowledge to do that.Thank you!&nbsp; It will be slow and up and down process.&nbsp; I decided to start this while I was taking a break from my Epic Monster Updates and Epic Character Updates and I am now realizing I don't have the time I would like to work on this. I will keep working on it - it will just take longer than I had originally hoped.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dave2008, post: 6994756, member: 83242"] OK - I'm ready to give this a shot! I agree, that is why, as noted in an earlier post, that the revised guidelines would be explicit and say this table is designed for a party of 4 composed of 1 fighter, 1 cleric, 1 rogue, and 1 wizard using the basic rules. And then I would have to develop suggestions / guidelines for different sized parties and parties of a different composition. I've thought about it. 1 table with descriptions on how to modify, or multiple tables with a different set of assumptions. I haven't decided yet, but I was leaning toward one table. I'm starting to rethink that approach. But if we make different tables for a different base assumptions, wouldn't the modifiers still apply? I think the revised table does exactly that, but it might be more noticeable at 5th level (fireball). I intend to. Could work, to me that seems like 6 in one, a half dozen in the other. Yes, ideally that is the type of analysis that should be done. I just don't know that I have the time or knowledge to do that. Thank you! It will be slow and up and down process. I decided to start this while I was taking a break from my Epic Monster Updates and Epic Character Updates and I am now realizing I don't have the time I would like to work on this. I will keep working on it - it will just take longer than I had originally hoped. [/QUOTE]

Verification