Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Encounter idea - vs player-like NPCs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5241432" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>PCs as opponents is horribly swingy. At level 1 for instance a great weapon fighter using a great sword and using Brute Strike has an expected damage of 3d10+4 or 20 points of damage on average and a max of 34 points. This is ALMOST enough to fell a defender, most leaders, and practically all strikers and controllers. A bow ranger with Twin Strike and a Great Bow could easily dish out 2d12+1d6, again average 16.5 damage with a max of 30, which is enough to instantly fell some character and would nearly fell even the toughest and he can do that every round.</p><p></p><p>The fight can easily turn out like enemy party gets a bit lucky and 2 of their number go first, probably the bow ranger and an equally dangerous rogue. The party defender's first action could easily be a death save. </p><p></p><p>Obviously on average the PCs will win if the other party is weaker, its just a lot less certain than with a more typical type of encounter vs monsters. Its probably no worse than springing 5 orcs on an AD&D party of 5, but I have seen TPKs in THAT scenario. You should be prepared to have one here. As long as that's OK, go for it.</p><p></p><p>However, I would really recommend stating out the enemy monster-style. Less damage output, simpler powers, lower defenses on average, and just a lot easier to run. For a starting out level 1 group 5 standard level 1 monsters should challenge them. Just theme them like PCs. The 'fighter' monster can mark and has an immediate interrupt to punish a mark, the 'rogue' gets +2d6 damage if it has CA, the 'ranger' can use HQ and makes 2 attacks/rnd, the 'cleric' grants his allies +2 to the next attack vs anyone he hits with his mace, and the 'wizard' shoots magic missile, scorching burst, and has an encounter power that can immobilize 1 or 2 targets for a round. It will FEEL like a party of adventurers, but it will be MUCH easier to run and a lot less swingy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5241432, member: 82106"] PCs as opponents is horribly swingy. At level 1 for instance a great weapon fighter using a great sword and using Brute Strike has an expected damage of 3d10+4 or 20 points of damage on average and a max of 34 points. This is ALMOST enough to fell a defender, most leaders, and practically all strikers and controllers. A bow ranger with Twin Strike and a Great Bow could easily dish out 2d12+1d6, again average 16.5 damage with a max of 30, which is enough to instantly fell some character and would nearly fell even the toughest and he can do that every round. The fight can easily turn out like enemy party gets a bit lucky and 2 of their number go first, probably the bow ranger and an equally dangerous rogue. The party defender's first action could easily be a death save. Obviously on average the PCs will win if the other party is weaker, its just a lot less certain than with a more typical type of encounter vs monsters. Its probably no worse than springing 5 orcs on an AD&D party of 5, but I have seen TPKs in THAT scenario. You should be prepared to have one here. As long as that's OK, go for it. However, I would really recommend stating out the enemy monster-style. Less damage output, simpler powers, lower defenses on average, and just a lot easier to run. For a starting out level 1 group 5 standard level 1 monsters should challenge them. Just theme them like PCs. The 'fighter' monster can mark and has an immediate interrupt to punish a mark, the 'rogue' gets +2d6 damage if it has CA, the 'ranger' can use HQ and makes 2 attacks/rnd, the 'cleric' grants his allies +2 to the next attack vs anyone he hits with his mace, and the 'wizard' shoots magic missile, scorching burst, and has an encounter power that can immobilize 1 or 2 targets for a round. It will FEEL like a party of adventurers, but it will be MUCH easier to run and a lot less swingy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Encounter idea - vs player-like NPCs?
Top