Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Encounter power buffs outside of combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kennew142" data-source="post: 4159216" data-attributes="member: 18490"><p>To each his own, but I've never understood the argument. I don't see it as metagaming if a player acts according to the rules. IMO the rules are designed to allow us to tell an interactive story. They don't equate to the physics of the world. They allow us, as near-omniscient outside observers, to model how the characters interact with the world in a simplistic (compared to actual physics) model, involving turns, encounters, numerical ratings of hit points, defenses, skills, etc....</p><p></p><p>Attempting to model a world's physics by the game rules leads to ridiculous situations like you've described. This has been true for every edition of D&D. If the game rules require a PC to kill X number of enemies in order to advance to a level where they can raise the dead, does that mean that every NPC cleric has a lengthy combat resume? What about pacifist clerics of healing gods, can they never advance as healers just because they don't slaughter orcs for a living? To cite an even more laughable example, what about a baker? If he want to be able to produce elaborate baked goods, he can only learn it by killing kobolds?</p><p></p><p>If the experience system doesn't have to model the natural laws by which butchers, bakers and candlestick makers learn their trades, why do the game rules we use to model powers and timekeeping have to reflect natural laws instead of simple gaming conventions?</p><p></p><p>The following isn't necessarily directed at Lizard, but at a generic you that includes me on occasion, when I don't like a rule.</p><p></p><p>It seems that this argument falls on its face whenever it's applied across the board. It works much better when you're trying to make illogical arguments in order to invalidate game rules you don't like. Any game rule can be made to seem ridiculous if it's overanalyzed. No game system is complex enough to model the actual laws of nature/physics. They simplify reality in order to model it just enough to make an enjoyable game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kennew142, post: 4159216, member: 18490"] To each his own, but I've never understood the argument. I don't see it as metagaming if a player acts according to the rules. IMO the rules are designed to allow us to tell an interactive story. They don't equate to the physics of the world. They allow us, as near-omniscient outside observers, to model how the characters interact with the world in a simplistic (compared to actual physics) model, involving turns, encounters, numerical ratings of hit points, defenses, skills, etc.... Attempting to model a world's physics by the game rules leads to ridiculous situations like you've described. This has been true for every edition of D&D. If the game rules require a PC to kill X number of enemies in order to advance to a level where they can raise the dead, does that mean that every NPC cleric has a lengthy combat resume? What about pacifist clerics of healing gods, can they never advance as healers just because they don't slaughter orcs for a living? To cite an even more laughable example, what about a baker? If he want to be able to produce elaborate baked goods, he can only learn it by killing kobolds? If the experience system doesn't have to model the natural laws by which butchers, bakers and candlestick makers learn their trades, why do the game rules we use to model powers and timekeeping have to reflect natural laws instead of simple gaming conventions? The following isn't necessarily directed at Lizard, but at a generic you that includes me on occasion, when I don't like a rule. It seems that this argument falls on its face whenever it's applied across the board. It works much better when you're trying to make illogical arguments in order to invalidate game rules you don't like. Any game rule can be made to seem ridiculous if it's overanalyzed. No game system is complex enough to model the actual laws of nature/physics. They simplify reality in order to model it just enough to make an enjoyable game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Encounter power buffs outside of combat
Top