Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FiddleSticks96" data-source="post: 5507855" data-attributes="member: 6673096">I'm just saying something I read in the Book of Exalted deeds. There was an example good mind flayer that also swore an oath not to cause harm to living creatures.Don't think so. We've played for years but I don't recall encountering an Archlich. That will be something we'll have to think about. I'm sick of always being the DM, but that is a completely other rant.As we've played since AD&amp;D, we're familiar with many rules, new and old. I personally am fairly new to versions beyond AD&amp;D. I skipped 3.0 and went right to 3.5. I've read some of the 4.0 rules and I don't like how everything is overly simplified. I'm getting off topic...My point is, the players understand the rules, and I haven't changed anything for the mechanics on changing alignments. As pawsplay said, angels can become evil and demons can become good. The point of this moral dilemma is to not give them a black and white answer, as that would defeat the purpose of &quot;dilemma&quot;. It's one of those decisions you have to stop and think about before making it.Next session is tomorrow <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="FiddleSticks96, post: 5507855, member: 6673096"] I'm just saying something I read in the Book of Exalted deeds. There was an example good mind flayer that also swore an oath not to cause harm to living creatures. Don't think so. We've played for years but I don't recall encountering an Archlich. That will be something we'll have to think about. I'm sick of always being the DM, but that is a completely other rant. As we've played since AD&D, we're familiar with many rules, new and old. I personally am fairly new to versions beyond AD&D. I skipped 3.0 and went right to 3.5. I've read some of the 4.0 rules and I don't like how everything is overly simplified. I'm getting off topic... My point is, the players understand the rules, and I haven't changed anything for the mechanics on changing alignments. As pawsplay said, angels can become evil and demons can become good. The point of this moral dilemma is to not give them a black and white answer, as that would defeat the purpose of "dilemma". It's one of those decisions you have to stop and think about before making it. Next session is tomorrow :) [/QUOTE]

Verification