Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Encouraging players to role-play multiclassing?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bendris Noulg" data-source="post: 1379523" data-attributes="member: 6398"><p>Alright, I think we're both cooling off here... Nifty.</p><p> </p><p>Ah, now Feats I handle differently. In fact, any player can bring me any spell, feat, skill use, weapon, etc., from any book for me to review for inclusion. They just can't bring me Prestige Classes.</p><p> </p><p>Table Talk: If you mention a "cool" Prestige Class, I'd likely look it up later... Even if the Prestige Class itself is rejected, I do consider the theme/role/concept of it, likely coming up with something that is more suitable for both the character and the campaign setting. Obviously, not everything's going to make/create a new niche or fill an empty one, but the game does grow in that regard. What's aimed for is a bit of mystique; Not everything is laid out for people in the real world and I see little reason for it to be so in a fantasy one (although "off stage" events allow fantasy goals to be accomplished <strong>much</strong> faster than real life goals).</p><p> </p><p>The thing is that I tend to do this "in secret". That is to say, rather than say, "I have a Prestige Class I'm working on for your mounted Fighter," I'd instead have him meet (perhaps save) a member of a knightly order, which would have a Prestige Class suited for the PC.</p><p> </p><p>An example character: The player wants to play a mounted combatant. Now, he <em>might</em> consider a half-dozen Prestige Classes, picks the one he wants, and then maps into it as quickly as possible. Nothing wrong with that mechanically.</p><p> </p><p>Another example character: The player wants to be a mounted combatant. He uses all the base material available (Skills, Feats, etc.) to become as good at it as possible. Throughout the character's career, he's met the Chariot Warriors of Dael, the Host of Goshen, and the Mah'Don Knights (likely others, although he might be a tad too big for a Tasloi Wasp Rider). He could easily, by returning to either of these lands and contacting friends amongst their ranks, gain access to these Prestige Classes, the requirements of which (all base options) would be easy for our well-trained-but-unstyled mounted combatant as he already has most (if no all) of the options available without the Prestige Classes. He could very easily travel to each land and gain 1-2 levels or each, gaining the basics of several styles all the while.</p><p> </p><p>By not selecting options at the beginning, the player ends up with *more* options later.</p><p> </p><p>Another consideration: I (and most GMs) have little knowledge of what exact Prestige Classes are available at the beginning of a campaign. A movie can inspire one. A book might. One might occur to me as I'm developing a culture or religion or some other aspect. One might occur to me just looking at a character sheet and imagining a new direction of evolving the concept. And, on rare occasions, I'll be flipping through a d20 book and actually find one that fits the campaign in both power and flavor. By selecting a Prestige Class (and even multiclasses) at the very beginning of the game, and mapping to that Prestige Class, the player is effectively eliminating opportunities that, for all intents and purposes, don't exist yet but may indeed be better for the character (conceptually and/or numerically).</p><p> </p><p>All I ask of players is to relax about it, not to worry about a pre-mapped plan of advancement, and to trust me not unbalance the game or screw them over. Those that do often become permanent features of my dining room (a mixed blessing?), while those that don't generally leave for their own inability to trust a GM rather than any act of maliciousness on my part.</p><p> </p><p>Y'know, I think more than a few conversations on this (and similar) topics tend to "go south" from time to time. Sometimes comments sound malicious because they're similar to something posted by someone else at an earlier time who <em>was</em> being malicious. I think we can just drop some of the chest puffing as a defensive mechanism running on autopilot due to earlier instances.</p><p> </p><p>Fair enough?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bendris Noulg, post: 1379523, member: 6398"] Alright, I think we're both cooling off here... Nifty. Ah, now Feats I handle differently. In fact, any player can bring me any spell, feat, skill use, weapon, etc., from any book for me to review for inclusion. They just can't bring me Prestige Classes. Table Talk: If you mention a "cool" Prestige Class, I'd likely look it up later... Even if the Prestige Class itself is rejected, I do consider the theme/role/concept of it, likely coming up with something that is more suitable for both the character and the campaign setting. Obviously, not everything's going to make/create a new niche or fill an empty one, but the game does grow in that regard. What's aimed for is a bit of mystique; Not everything is laid out for people in the real world and I see little reason for it to be so in a fantasy one (although "off stage" events allow fantasy goals to be accomplished [b]much[/b] faster than real life goals). The thing is that I tend to do this "in secret". That is to say, rather than say, "I have a Prestige Class I'm working on for your mounted Fighter," I'd instead have him meet (perhaps save) a member of a knightly order, which would have a Prestige Class suited for the PC. An example character: The player wants to play a mounted combatant. Now, he [i]might[/i] consider a half-dozen Prestige Classes, picks the one he wants, and then maps into it as quickly as possible. Nothing wrong with that mechanically. Another example character: The player wants to be a mounted combatant. He uses all the base material available (Skills, Feats, etc.) to become as good at it as possible. Throughout the character's career, he's met the Chariot Warriors of Dael, the Host of Goshen, and the Mah'Don Knights (likely others, although he might be a tad too big for a Tasloi Wasp Rider). He could easily, by returning to either of these lands and contacting friends amongst their ranks, gain access to these Prestige Classes, the requirements of which (all base options) would be easy for our well-trained-but-unstyled mounted combatant as he already has most (if no all) of the options available without the Prestige Classes. He could very easily travel to each land and gain 1-2 levels or each, gaining the basics of several styles all the while. By not selecting options at the beginning, the player ends up with *more* options later. Another consideration: I (and most GMs) have little knowledge of what exact Prestige Classes are available at the beginning of a campaign. A movie can inspire one. A book might. One might occur to me as I'm developing a culture or religion or some other aspect. One might occur to me just looking at a character sheet and imagining a new direction of evolving the concept. And, on rare occasions, I'll be flipping through a d20 book and actually find one that fits the campaign in both power and flavor. By selecting a Prestige Class (and even multiclasses) at the very beginning of the game, and mapping to that Prestige Class, the player is effectively eliminating opportunities that, for all intents and purposes, don't exist yet but may indeed be better for the character (conceptually and/or numerically). All I ask of players is to relax about it, not to worry about a pre-mapped plan of advancement, and to trust me not unbalance the game or screw them over. Those that do often become permanent features of my dining room (a mixed blessing?), while those that don't generally leave for their own inability to trust a GM rather than any act of maliciousness on my part. Y'know, I think more than a few conversations on this (and similar) topics tend to "go south" from time to time. Sometimes comments sound malicious because they're similar to something posted by someone else at an earlier time who [i]was[/i] being malicious. I think we can just drop some of the chest puffing as a defensive mechanism running on autopilot due to earlier instances. Fair enough? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Encouraging players to role-play multiclassing?
Top