Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zombie_Babies" data-source="post: 6215290" data-attributes="member: 6750039">Welp, that certainly does appear to be where we're at.  Thanks for the discussion/argument.  It was a lot of fun!  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />That's disturbing.  You see, it's implying that you're perfectly comfortable with vigilante justice missing the target because the legal system will make it right.  Well, last I checked the legal system can't raise the dead.Whoa, slow down there pardner.  It most certainly is not a fact that he ever put her in a position where lethal self defense was warranted and, even if he did, she still shouldn't get a pass for killing him when he wasn't a threat.Yep.  Emotionally.Again, let's slow down.  That's a hell of an assumption there.  You see, what you say I want - her to not be able to raise her daughter - would actually be a consequence of what I want which, of course, is proper punishment for her crime.A lot of bad folks in prison have kids.  Should we let all of 'em out?I'm not bemoaning anything - I'm participating in an exchange of ideas that's interesting, thought provoking and informative in regard to the personalities of the folks I'm discussing this with.  It's kinda sorta exactly what an internet forum is all about.We can move on, though.  What-evs.  I will tell you, though, that if you make assumptions about my position or intent or whatever I'll continue to correct you.  That's just how I am.  Oh, and I don't mean to imply that you did or will do any of that on purpose.  I definitely do not think that's how you roll - far from it.  Just wanna make that clear.</blockquote>

Verification