Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GMforPowergamers" data-source="post: 8686061" data-attributes="member: 67338">or... if it was 1 on 1... aka not the whole party vs 1, but 1 on 1. onlyy as long as you are engageing in it... if you drop it so will I just instead of taking and adding put forward a new one...in fact I will put 3 (1 were it doesn't work, 1 were the advantage could help and one were it is kinda blah)Example 1&nbsp;&nbsp; 12 kobolds against 4 PCs none of witch have a good AOE.&nbsp;&nbsp; Kobolds already have pact tactics so this is little to no helpExample 2&nbsp; A Bugbear with some rogue like things thrown on&nbsp; as an &quot;asssassin&quot; and his 5 goblin allies 2 of witch have the rogue cunning action feature.&nbsp; vs 2 high AC (like 18+) PCs and 2 mod to weak AC (like 15-) PCsExample 3&nbsp; 2 goblins riding worgs vs 3 PC casters with low AC (13-)now if you wish to discuse any of them I am more then happy if you stop beating the 1 on 1 exampleexcept it was an example given by the guy selling us on the rule... I was thinking the rule weird and not helpful in BETTER examples, when he said this one it made it WORSE...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="GMforPowergamers, post: 8686061, member: 67338"] or... if it was 1 on 1... aka not the whole party vs 1, but 1 on 1. onlyy as long as you are engageing in it... if you drop it so will I just instead of taking and adding put forward a new one... in fact I will put 3 (1 were it doesn't work, 1 were the advantage could help and one were it is kinda blah) Example 1 12 kobolds against 4 PCs none of witch have a good AOE. Kobolds already have pact tactics so this is little to no help Example 2 A Bugbear with some rogue like things thrown on as an "asssassin" and his 5 goblin allies 2 of witch have the rogue cunning action feature. vs 2 high AC (like 18+) PCs and 2 mod to weak AC (like 15-) PCs Example 3 2 goblins riding worgs vs 3 PC casters with low AC (13-) now if you wish to discuse any of them I am more then happy if you stop beating the 1 on 1 example except it was an example given by the guy selling us on the rule... I was thinking the rule weird and not helpful in BETTER examples, when he said this one it made it WORSE... [/QUOTE]

Verification