Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CaBaNa" data-source="post: 4988570" data-attributes="member: 82643">[sblock=Mal]No worries mate, we had communication issues. When Catein moved back, and Bell moved back, I had thought the group was in a partial retreat. So I wanted to lay down the "soft" zone of grasping shadows TENT, to make that area penalizing to move through (slow condition...). I didn't realize Kendrick's favored targets would be in the zone, or that Kendrick wanted to move forward.  Also to separate, <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/living-4th-edition/264890-enemy-among-us-dm-stringbean2142-judge-twoheadsbarking-15.html#post4985552" target="_blank">Veruzak made a demand. CaBaNa, asked a question</a>. I'm not trying to muscle in on your characters sovereignty.About the post assuming Kendrick had moved, I understand how you could have gotten the impression, that I was attempting to encroach on your characters sovereignty. On the other side, the first thing in that post, is delay until after Kendrick. If Kendrick had said no (as he did IC), and ignored my request, Veruzak would have made different decisions to reflect that. It was late at night, and I wanted to post a turn, it could be changed if Kendrick said no. From here on out, I'll post an alternate set of actions, in the event of a "no" answer. That should go a long way to avoid the feeling of encroachment on character sovereignty.Please do separate CaBaNa (me), from Veruzak though. I (CaBaNa) will ask you questions politely, OOC, with no expectation on your answer. Veruzak will demand that your character do something, and then get upset when he doesn't. Martelai, Catein, Bell, and Atlas, have all ignored Veruzak, to great RP effect! I (CaBaNa) love that, as Veruzak getting put in his place is very entertaining to me. He isn't that powerful a wizard, he doesn't know that much, and he is far too over-confidant and evil, for me to not get a great chuckle out of him getting shut down.Once again, just for the record, No hard feelings. I do understand where you're coming from, and will do what is in my power to make sure it doesn't happen again. [/sblock][sblock=OOC]Thanks for the interjection Neurotic, and the round update.Veruzak is at +2 defenses from total defense, and is prone, so -2 to ranged attacks against him. Hit that little jellyfish of doom![/sblock]</blockquote>

Verification