Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Energy damage on Trip touch attack?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 3028218" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>I disagree.</p><p></p><p>My statement:</p><p></p><p></p><p>is easy enough to disprove- produce a rule that says melee weapons cannot be used for touch attacks.</p><p></p><p>There is no <em>logical</em> reason why they cannot, as the RW example of counting coup illustrates.</p><p></p><p>The only section that says anything about them just tells you the mechanics of calculating the AC for such an attack.</p><p></p><p>At this point, all we have is an assumption that melee weapons cannot be used to deliver a touch attack- an assumption as yet unsupported by ANYTHING.</p><p></p><p>In truth, this would be a suboptimal use of such a weapon 99.9% of the time. But suboptimal doesn't mean impossible or illegal.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree, and I pointed out that is why most people assume that they do not normally do damage.</p><p></p><p>However, damage from enchantments are triggered by successful hits, not by the damage from the underlying weapons they enchant.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I have already illustrated why the enchantment damage is seperate from the underlying damage- it is not dependend upon damage being dealt, it is dependent <em>only</em> upon there being a successful hit. And a successful hit is a prerequisite of a trip attack.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course not- the Melee Touch attack rules state <em>nothing</em> about damage, only about how to calculate AC for such attacks.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>The rules cited are all Core, and thus interact to shape the environment in which we play.</p><p></p><p>If we eliminated all inferences, if we eliminate rules interpretation, we will inevitably wind up with some kind of conundrum that is insoluable.</p><p></p><p>For instance, you complained that the "The Melee Touch Attack rules do not state that weapon energy damage is ever added to a melee touch attack or to a non-damaging attack"</p><p></p><p>But as I pointed out- that section says NADA about damage. Not Strength bonuses, not spell damage, nothing.</p><p></p><p>By your logic, NO damage can be dealt by a melee touch attack because I'm making an inferrence that such attacks are capable of doing damage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 3028218, member: 19675"] I disagree. My statement: is easy enough to disprove- produce a rule that says melee weapons cannot be used for touch attacks. There is no [I]logical[/I] reason why they cannot, as the RW example of counting coup illustrates. The only section that says anything about them just tells you the mechanics of calculating the AC for such an attack. At this point, all we have is an assumption that melee weapons cannot be used to deliver a touch attack- an assumption as yet unsupported by ANYTHING. In truth, this would be a suboptimal use of such a weapon 99.9% of the time. But suboptimal doesn't mean impossible or illegal. I agree, and I pointed out that is why most people assume that they do not normally do damage. However, damage from enchantments are triggered by successful hits, not by the damage from the underlying weapons they enchant. I have already illustrated why the enchantment damage is seperate from the underlying damage- it is not dependend upon damage being dealt, it is dependent [I]only[/I] upon there being a successful hit. And a successful hit is a prerequisite of a trip attack. Of course not- the Melee Touch attack rules state [I]nothing[/I] about damage, only about how to calculate AC for such attacks. The rules cited are all Core, and thus interact to shape the environment in which we play. If we eliminated all inferences, if we eliminate rules interpretation, we will inevitably wind up with some kind of conundrum that is insoluable. For instance, you complained that the "The Melee Touch Attack rules do not state that weapon energy damage is ever added to a melee touch attack or to a non-damaging attack" But as I pointed out- that section says NADA about damage. Not Strength bonuses, not spell damage, nothing. By your logic, NO damage can be dealt by a melee touch attack because I'm making an inferrence that such attacks are capable of doing damage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Energy damage on Trip touch attack?
Top