Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scion" data-source="post: 1490691" data-attributes="member: 5777">Who knows? You tell me, why do you refuse to see? Take the way I am saying, put it through all of the rules, see if there is any logical inconsistancy. So far there have been none. Which means that, by the raw, it is correct.I have used so many in order to point out how many times it states what I have said. But it isnt very many, it is simply the same two pages over and over again. I have quoted most of those two pages which directly talk about how the caster gets/loses his spells. If you wish to rely on a rule that has no bearing, and that I have already shown to be useless in this case several times, that is your own business. But dont hold it up as your talisman, it doesnt say anything useful for the topic.If you wish to be irrelevant like that then I will start quoting text from the aoo's section and saying that it proves my point. That way we are both being irrelevant.Here we go again, you misquoting and misrepresenting. But I will say it another time, just in case you will read it this time.It changes your modifier and the amount of bonus spells you get in a day 'if you were prepareing right now'. The quotes above tell how and when this sort of thing happens, and it is after resting, during the preperation time. You do not gain them at any other time, so why should you lose them at any other time? No reason except for whatever you feel like imposing on the ruleset yourself.Clearly stated is just that. You rest, you regain your slots, you move on. No where does it state that you lose those slots by having your stat changed. So, in absence of your all powerful rule, you dont lose them. Just like you dont lose d6 hp/round of standing on one foot. The rules dont say that you do. Why you are trying to impose something that isnt there is anyones guess, but since it isnt necissary, and can lead to abuse, why bother?Other than it doesnt say anywhere that the rules work the way you say and that you are attempting to impose conditions that dont exist? Fine then. Come back whenever you have a real arguement, or can find something that actually proves your point.Until then though, I'll just play by the raw.</blockquote>

Verification