Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
ENnie Nominations!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgbrowning" data-source="post: 978886" data-attributes="member: 5724"><p><strong>hrm</strong></p><p></p><p>What if everyone arranged the products from most favorite to least favorite? (IE basically giving a 10,9,8,7,6 to each category: or an I don't know.)It would minimize company internal competition and prevent people from voting against products. Unless, of course, i'm missing a different effect.</p><p></p><p>I suppose this way people wouldn't be able to say that two products were equal... hrm..</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Basically, yes. But you can also view the old system as a binary vote. 1-0-0-0-0. The difference between a ten and a one can lead to lots of problems. If 10 people vote with their conscience and give the products 7-10 range votes and one person want one product to win and votes 10-0-0-0-0 (although he thinks the ohter products are good, he wants that one product ot win) having this type of voting system makes his vote disproprotionally important. Imagine if you could vote 1-1,000,000. The number range seems to amplify the dilemma.</p><p></p><p>I like the idea of arraiging the products in order of preference because it removes this type of abuse. While still allowing people to provide opinion byeond the old binary system.</p><p></p><p>joe b.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgbrowning, post: 978886, member: 5724"] [b]hrm[/b] What if everyone arranged the products from most favorite to least favorite? (IE basically giving a 10,9,8,7,6 to each category: or an I don't know.)It would minimize company internal competition and prevent people from voting against products. Unless, of course, i'm missing a different effect. I suppose this way people wouldn't be able to say that two products were equal... hrm.. Basically, yes. But you can also view the old system as a binary vote. 1-0-0-0-0. The difference between a ten and a one can lead to lots of problems. If 10 people vote with their conscience and give the products 7-10 range votes and one person want one product to win and votes 10-0-0-0-0 (although he thinks the ohter products are good, he wants that one product ot win) having this type of voting system makes his vote disproprotionally important. Imagine if you could vote 1-1,000,000. The number range seems to amplify the dilemma. I like the idea of arraiging the products in order of preference because it removes this type of abuse. While still allowing people to provide opinion byeond the old binary system. joe b. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
ENnie Nominations!
Top