Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jgbrowning" data-source="post: 978926" data-attributes="member: 5724">Re: Re: hrmThat's what I'm worried about as well. Honestly there isnt a group more likely to min/max their votes effectiveness than a gamer....  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Voting 10 and then all 0s was the first thing I though about, I'm ashamed to say, but playing this game for so damn long it has cemented that pattern of thinking. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />The really bad thing with such a vote is that a small number of people could really mess things up quickly.  But if we force people to make a 10-9-8-7-6 vote, we're basically forcing them to make a vote based more upon quality than competition (desire for one product to win regardless of quality of the other works).  Unfortunatly it means that some people cant vote two books as equal.  I don't know how to allow both while not allowing those 10-0'ers....Any ideas for the mathematically gifted?joe b.</blockquote>