Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Darrin Drader" data-source="post: 730268" data-attributes="member: 7394">Well, Dareoon Dalandrove, (if that is your real name <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />) I agree with you up to this point:I think you're on to a good train of thought, but the idea is derailed at the end. With the blatant market dominance WotC has, most people will vote for the WotC products because they own them, but no other products in a given category. A better suggestion is to make it so that you can't vote on a category unless you own and heave read every product in a category. Of course if this is impletemented, I predict a lot of people would vote anyway since it would be on the honor system, or they would base their votes on the reviews that are posted, effectively allowing professional reviewers to vote for them.</blockquote>