Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="MavrickWeirdo" data-source="post: 2062505" data-attributes="member: 107">In example 1, 55% are voting strategically. In example 2, 50% are voting strategically.My assumption is that the different strategic voters are evenly divided between the products, which could very well be wrong.In the second example I had the strategic voters put who they though least likely to win to prevent the "Leading Canidate" from winningThe author of "All Crunch, No Fluff" wanted to make sure that, not only did "E" not get his vote (he only voted for three out of 5), but that the least-likely canidate would get his vote instead of E, if "A" is eliminated. Due to multiple people using this strategy the least likely canidate "D" actually won. It depends on Author of "A" seeing "C" as a threat instead of an alternative.</blockquote>