Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
ENnies discussion thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nisarg" data-source="post: 2064148" data-attributes="member: 19893"><p>Allow me to elaborate further with a specific example.</p><p></p><p>If an award for artwork had Nobilis on it, I would have to give it an 8 or 9; or Cover Art might even warrant a 10. </p><p></p><p>If it was an overall award, however, I would give Nobilis a 1. I think its a lousy work, filled with disgusting pretentious drivel, horrible structure making it harder to understand than your typical calculus textbook, sloppy editing, terrible prose, an abhorrent game system, and it may have given my cat syphilis.</p><p>Therefore I give it a 1. You, in your infinite wisdom of judging me of "falsely" giving a 1, are really just imposing your opinion that Nobilis "isn't actually all that bad" on my vote. </p><p>I KNOW there are people who think Nobilis isn't all that bad; let them give it a 3, or 5, or 10, or whatever they want to. TO ME, for reasons I justify within myself, Nobilis IS that bad, and merits the 1. </p><p>I'm not giving it the 1 to help some other item 1, I'm giving it the 1 because I despise it as a work, intellectually and emotionally, and this is my way of defecating on it and all it stands for.</p><p>Its hate-based voting at its finest. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /> </p><p></p><p>Now, you're saying that if I happen to give Nobilis a 1 and some other truly excellent product (let's say Amber) that happened to be in the same category (let's say "best diceless game of all time") a 10, you will annul my vote. Even though I LEGITIMATELY feel Nobilis deserves a 1 and Amber a 10. My giving Nobilis the 1 has nothing to do with my giving Amber the 10, I gave each that because of how I really feel about them. </p><p></p><p>Now, I know you said you only annulled people gave a single 10 and all the rest 1s, but that could also conceivably happen, particularly in my case it could happen in the example I used, as NONE of the diceless games I know of are any good at all with the exception of Amber, which is excellent. So in that category, I would have all 1s in every other entry I knew. So unless by a stroke of luck there was an item I didn't know and marked N/A, you would have annulled my LEGITIMATE vote because of your perceptions about how I voted the 1. </p><p></p><p>As soon as you start being the judge of how you imagine people's thought-processes were running when they voted, you enter into slippery-slope territory. What if someone gives a 1 to a product you happen to hate, will you then be as quick to judge their vote "unjustified"? At least to some extent, then, it all turns into being about what you personally believe a product merits or doesn't merit.</p><p></p><p>Nisarg</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nisarg, post: 2064148, member: 19893"] Allow me to elaborate further with a specific example. If an award for artwork had Nobilis on it, I would have to give it an 8 or 9; or Cover Art might even warrant a 10. If it was an overall award, however, I would give Nobilis a 1. I think its a lousy work, filled with disgusting pretentious drivel, horrible structure making it harder to understand than your typical calculus textbook, sloppy editing, terrible prose, an abhorrent game system, and it may have given my cat syphilis. Therefore I give it a 1. You, in your infinite wisdom of judging me of "falsely" giving a 1, are really just imposing your opinion that Nobilis "isn't actually all that bad" on my vote. I KNOW there are people who think Nobilis isn't all that bad; let them give it a 3, or 5, or 10, or whatever they want to. TO ME, for reasons I justify within myself, Nobilis IS that bad, and merits the 1. I'm not giving it the 1 to help some other item 1, I'm giving it the 1 because I despise it as a work, intellectually and emotionally, and this is my way of defecating on it and all it stands for. Its hate-based voting at its finest. :cool: Now, you're saying that if I happen to give Nobilis a 1 and some other truly excellent product (let's say Amber) that happened to be in the same category (let's say "best diceless game of all time") a 10, you will annul my vote. Even though I LEGITIMATELY feel Nobilis deserves a 1 and Amber a 10. My giving Nobilis the 1 has nothing to do with my giving Amber the 10, I gave each that because of how I really feel about them. Now, I know you said you only annulled people gave a single 10 and all the rest 1s, but that could also conceivably happen, particularly in my case it could happen in the example I used, as NONE of the diceless games I know of are any good at all with the exception of Amber, which is excellent. So in that category, I would have all 1s in every other entry I knew. So unless by a stroke of luck there was an item I didn't know and marked N/A, you would have annulled my LEGITIMATE vote because of your perceptions about how I voted the 1. As soon as you start being the judge of how you imagine people's thought-processes were running when they voted, you enter into slippery-slope territory. What if someone gives a 1 to a product you happen to hate, will you then be as quick to judge their vote "unjustified"? At least to some extent, then, it all turns into being about what you personally believe a product merits or doesn't merit. Nisarg [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
ENnies discussion thread
Top