Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="The Sigil" data-source="post: 1395026" data-attributes="member: 2013">I think Morrus was just trying to correct me; when the ENnies were conceived, the OGL/d20 was relatively new, and everyone was going d20.  It wasn't until some of the "problems" inherent in using the d20 license arose (e.g., Chargen) that more people started going OGL-only.  Clearly, M&M is still built on the same engine as D&D, though it is considerably different in flavor and tone.My point, I guess... is that the ENnies need to stay focused on Open-Gaming et al...  ENWorld is not a GURPS site, not a Magic:the Gathering site, etc... if GURPS or MtG had been released this year, would we throw them into the "non-d20/Open Game" category?  How many people on these boards would know about them to intelligently cast a vote?Basically, the ENnies should restrict themselves to covering what ENWorld covers - which is, by and large, Open Gaming products.  That's not trying to be "discriminatory" or anything, but I know I wouldn't be comfortable trying to judge the relative merits of the latest non-OGL/d20 White Wolf, Steve Jackson Games, Palladium, and other such releases.  Does that help my original point - "Open Gaming stuff Only" - make sense?--The Sigil</blockquote>