Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9570081" data-attributes="member: 7023840">First, I think that this is a great change, and it will be appreciated. If people want to use generative AI, they can. But in terms of awards such as ENnies which honor a part of the community that mostly chooses to eschew a model that devalues creative labor (the labor that is paid for this work), I think that this is appropriate.I would note two things-1. It appears the onus is on the creator to certify. I think most people are honest, and to the extent someone is dishonest, well ... a false certification would be playing with fire, because if it is ever found out that you did break the rules, I wouldn't want to be ya.2. I will also say that (IMO) this policy will only last so long as the AI can't generate the good stuff. Because as soon as it gets to that point, no policy will keep our AI overlords from making us play their games. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />PS- I am not against AI. I think it can be a great benefit! I do think that most people that discuss it don't truly understand what is going on. I am concerned that the people that write laws know even less. Finally, I am not sure we are going to handle the upcoming transitions that well. But what do I know? I am not Snarftradus.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 9570081, member: 7023840"] First, I think that this is a great change, and it will be appreciated. If people want to use generative AI, they can. But in terms of awards such as ENnies which honor a part of the community that mostly chooses to eschew a model that devalues creative labor (the labor that is paid for this work), I think that this is appropriate. I would note two things- 1. It appears the onus is on the creator to certify. I think most people are honest, and to the extent someone is dishonest, well ... a false certification would be playing with fire, because if it is ever found out that you did break the rules, I wouldn't want to be ya. 2. I will also say that (IMO) this policy will only last so long as the AI can't generate the good stuff. Because as soon as it gets to that point, no policy will keep our AI overlords from making us play their games. :) PS- I am not against AI. I think it can be a great benefit! I do think that most people that discuss it don't truly understand what is going on. I am concerned that the people that write laws know even less. Finally, I am not sure we are going to handle the upcoming transitions that well. But what do I know? I am not Snarftradus. [/QUOTE]

Verification