Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="LordEntrails" data-source="post: 9575832" data-attributes="member: 6804070">By the mob of course. How else do we judge things in this community? Certainly not be reason and careful consideration!Exactly. There is no way to reliable know if an image or text was AI generated. So instead all this rule does is CYA for the ENnies and place the rulings into the mob of social media. Which is more often than not, wrong.Yep, and though these programs are improving, they are improving less rapidly than the generative algorithms are. Relying upon them is plain stupidity as they have all been proven wrong countless times.Yea, not going to happen. Because you can't reliably prove AI use.All this does is an excuse to say &quot;Ee support traditional human artists! Take your pitchforks elsewhere!&quot;Exactly. For many it is simple an emotional issue.Like the mass production of the automobile was going to cause mean to not take care of their families or the extinction of horses. Like the photocopier was going to put publishers out of business. Or the camera, or electricity and the lightbulb, or a hundred other things.People respond emotionally when they feel threatened. Rather than learn and embrace the new technology they huddle, and shout, and call for doom and gloom.This decision is bad. Its unenforceable and simply proliferates fear and stagnation.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="LordEntrails, post: 9575832, member: 6804070"] By the mob of course. How else do we judge things in this community? Certainly not be reason and careful consideration! Exactly. There is no way to reliable know if an image or text was AI generated. So instead all this rule does is CYA for the ENnies and place the rulings into the mob of social media. Which is more often than not, wrong. Yep, and though these programs are improving, they are improving less rapidly than the generative algorithms are. Relying upon them is plain stupidity as they have all been proven wrong countless times. Yea, not going to happen. Because you can't reliably prove AI use. All this does is an excuse to say "Ee support traditional human artists! Take your pitchforks elsewhere!" Exactly. For many it is simple an emotional issue. Like the mass production of the automobile was going to cause mean to not take care of their families or the extinction of horses. Like the photocopier was going to put publishers out of business. Or the camera, or electricity and the lightbulb, or a hundred other things. People respond emotionally when they feel threatened. Rather than learn and embrace the new technology they huddle, and shout, and call for doom and gloom. This decision is bad. Its unenforceable and simply proliferates fear and stagnation. [/QUOTE]

Verification