Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LordEntrails" data-source="post: 9578293" data-attributes="member: 6804070">But it won't be. AI is indeed here to stay. Even Gen-Ai is not going away. The type of Gen-AI we are talking about here is very limited, and for use in fantasy RPGs you make some good points later on I will talk about. But, the technologies will not be going away. AI (gen and non-gen) are quickly becoming core to many very large industries. Like space, communications, intelligence, business analysis, aeronautics, defense, banking, and all types of engineering. Thinking about only he impact or viability to the entertainment/art industry is ignoring 95% of the usage."They"? Sure, the public ones the media likes to talk about are moving away from image generation. But like I said, all those industries I mentioned above are not moving away from Gen AI. Most are not using it for image generation, but they are investing billions of dollars and untold hours into AI. The technology is not going away, but it will probably not be used the way this forum talks about it.Absolutely, I've tried for some of the niche RPGs I play and the image gen AI's are practically useless. They are also currently near useless for doing things like top down tokens and battlemaps. But I don't think that's not for lack of data (tokens and maps), it just that such use has not been identified as a consumer desire so the they have not been trained to do this.I'm not opposed to the concept behind this new ENnie awards rule. (lets keep the awards to humans, not computers). But it has been implemented horribly. It's not enforceable because their is no reliable way to make the determination. And they haven't even said how they might make such determinations. That tells me that they did this simple as a CYA and are going to reply upon the mob to determine, and lynch, anyone who supposedly submits a work with AI in it. Therefore I'm opposed to the rule.</blockquote>

Verification