Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 1720754" data-attributes="member: 172">Here is where I express my insultedness. With the notions that the judges have to be drawn from elsewhere. That implies to me that someone feels we are biased or incapable of selecting non-d20 products. Yet amongst all the flap, this is never something I have heard anyone express. Quite the contrary, I go to non-d20 boards and hear people exclaim that they are impressed with our selections.Again, yes, this is a primarily d20 board. But Morrus has already made several moves towards more openness towards other systems on the boards. Frex, the review page. And people who come here play more than just d20. All of this years judges that I am aware of (am not sure about Rich) are familiar with other games. I've had Teflon Billy regale me with tales of playing OTE and having the GM micromanage the rules, and I got into a discussion with Joe and Chris about why I don't like tri-stat (which they obviously do...)Further, I think this year the judges have been fairly impartial. I have no special love for Unknown Armies or Xcrawl, but saw the quality in each.I would agree that we need sort of a "mission statement", and that is something I have heard from more credible/less ranty posters elsewhere.This gives me a thought though...</blockquote>