Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ed Cha" data-source="post: 1721981" data-attributes="member: 10972">I haven't had time to read the entire thread, but I personally think the ENnies are doing just fine. Even though my book, &quot;Village of Oester&quot; did not win in the Best Adventure category, it at least got the recognition it deserved from the judges. I think there may have been better organized voting by other publishers this year, but at least the nominations turned out pretty good. The only suggestion that I may have is that voting be restricted to registered members of EN World. This is after all, the ENnies. Sure, it's great if we can get new people to the site through the voting, but shouldn't they have to register? Also, if I may, I think the rating system should be narrowed down to a &quot;1 to 5&quot; star rating. The &quot;10&quot; system is too wide, in my opinion. Why not follow the same rating system used in the reviews section right here on the Web site?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ed Cha, post: 1721981, member: 10972"] I haven't had time to read the entire thread, but I personally think the ENnies are doing just fine. Even though my book, "Village of Oester" did not win in the Best Adventure category, it at least got the recognition it deserved from the judges. I think there may have been better organized voting by other publishers this year, but at least the nominations turned out pretty good. The only suggestion that I may have is that voting be restricted to [b]registered members[/b] of EN World. This is after all, the ENnies. Sure, it's great if we can get new people to the site through the voting, but shouldn't they have to register? Also, if I may, I think the rating system should be narrowed down to a [b]"1 to 5" star rating[/b]. The "10" system is too wide, in my opinion. Why not follow the same rating system used in the reviews section right here on the Web site? [/QUOTE]

Verification