Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nisarg" data-source="post: 1737511" data-attributes="member: 19893">Hi,I guess tehre are two fundamental issues here:1.&nbsp; What is manipulating the vote? For example, I didn't just give high votes to the products I did like, I also gave low votes to products I didn't.&nbsp; White Wolf did not end up doing well on my scoresheet.&nbsp;&nbsp; Is that manipulation? Or is that what is intended? Because really, if the people running the ENnies didn't want that kind of thing to happen they really shouldn't use that scoring system.&nbsp; I was damn sure that there were others out there who were giving my favourite products low scores too, so why wouldn't I do the same, to balance things out?2. Is it for some reason important for the Judges to know what product we hated as well as loved? Are we doing an equivalent of the razzies later? Because otherwise I don't see the point of a scoring system that ranks from 1-10, best to worst.&nbsp; It would seem more logical to vote simply for your first and second choices out of each list. That should be enough to allow a fair determination of a winner, and keep &quot;manipulation&quot; to a minimum.Nisarg</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nisarg, post: 1737511, member: 19893"] Hi, I guess tehre are two fundamental issues here: 1. What is manipulating the vote? For example, I didn't just give high votes to the products I did like, I also gave low votes to products I didn't. White Wolf did not end up doing well on my scoresheet. Is that manipulation? Or is that what is intended? Because really, if the people running the ENnies didn't want that kind of thing to happen they really shouldn't use that scoring system. I was damn sure that there were others out there who were giving my favourite products low scores too, so why wouldn't I do the same, to balance things out? 2. Is it for some reason important for the Judges to know what product we hated as well as loved? Are we doing an equivalent of the razzies later? Because otherwise I don't see the point of a scoring system that ranks from 1-10, best to worst. It would seem more logical to vote simply for your first and second choices out of each list. That should be enough to allow a fair determination of a winner, and keep "manipulation" to a minimum. Nisarg [/QUOTE]

Verification