Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Enterprise 01-08-03
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark" data-source="post: 624011" data-attributes="member: 5"><p><em>If your friends jumped off a cliff...</em> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I'm not convinced that a show cannot be just as engaging without such an arc. And let's not forget that I'm just suggesting it doesn't require a <em>series</em>-arc. Double episodes (such as the cliff-hangers), certainly individual episodes, and perhaps several consecutive episodes can all have their own arcs. The shows you mention above do just that even under the series-arc that exists. "No series-arc" does not mean that there is no story at all, but just that the series can be written with less restrictions on where it might be headed come seven years down the road.</p><p></p><p>To take that a step further, there is no reason why character-arcs cannot exist without a series-arc. These can be altered along the way, but we can certainly say that so-and-so is going to be bumped off by season X or that so-and-so will be promoted by season X, etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Pesky continuity! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> It may not be the reasoning behind using that story line in the first place, but it seems to have been a by-product, at the least.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It would seem that TNG, DS9 and Voyager all shared an overlapping timeline, but TOS was much earlier, of course. That being the case, and if Enterprise is meant to also stand alone, doesn't that mean that Enterprise could follow the same no-series-arc formula? Just a thought... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark, post: 624011, member: 5"] [i]If your friends jumped off a cliff...[/i] ;) I'm not convinced that a show cannot be just as engaging without such an arc. And let's not forget that I'm just suggesting it doesn't require a [i]series[/i]-arc. Double episodes (such as the cliff-hangers), certainly individual episodes, and perhaps several consecutive episodes can all have their own arcs. The shows you mention above do just that even under the series-arc that exists. "No series-arc" does not mean that there is no story at all, but just that the series can be written with less restrictions on where it might be headed come seven years down the road. To take that a step further, there is no reason why character-arcs cannot exist without a series-arc. These can be altered along the way, but we can certainly say that so-and-so is going to be bumped off by season X or that so-and-so will be promoted by season X, etc. Pesky continuity! :D It may not be the reasoning behind using that story line in the first place, but it seems to have been a by-product, at the least. It would seem that TNG, DS9 and Voyager all shared an overlapping timeline, but TOS was much earlier, of course. That being the case, and if Enterprise is meant to also stand alone, doesn't that mean that Enterprise could follow the same no-series-arc formula? Just a thought... ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Enterprise 01-08-03
Top